A Pittsburgh-based MD weighs in on an emerging area of focus in the healthcare industry.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following are remarks made by the author during a recent broadcast of Talk Ten Tuesdays.
Today I would like to focus on outpatient clinical documentation improvement (CDI), often referred to as the lowly stepchild of inpatient CDI efforts.
Personally, I feel it (outpatient CDI) can take over the spotlight from inpatient CDI, as it encompasses both the inpatient and outpatient world. Outpatient CDI programs are directed primarily by primary care providers, which are increasingly getting involved in shared savings agreements, Advanced Payment Programs (APPs), and the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). However, many specialists are asking to be involved as well.
One of the biggest differences between inpatient and outpatient CDI is that in the former arena, providers actually care about what you are teaching them. Providers who are engaged in risk-bearing contracts know that it is up to them to document and code the diagnoses that are relevant to the risk model. What a provider documents and codes will determine how successful they are in these risk-bearing contracts. But how can a provider remember all the things they need to document and code?
At the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), we have risk-bearing contracts for Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) plans, in addition to MIPS. It is impossible for any provider to know which diagnoses are relevant for each model, or to know if the diagnosis has been captured for the calendar year.
In addition, approximately 80 percent of our outpatient visits are coded by the provider, not a coder. As we all know, providers, especially physicians, are not taught coding and documentation rules in their training. We are trying to remedy that at UPMC, but it would be impossible to rely on providers to remember the relevant diagnoses for each risk-based model, and to ensure that they get on a claim.
One way to address this is to give the provider a list of diagnoses that have been coded in the past for their patient. This is helpful, but many providers find it annoying to have to deal with paper or electronic alerts for diagnoses that may or may not be relevant for the current visit.
Most providers get 15-20 minutes to spend with a patient, and we have heard loud and clear that they want an easy-to-use tool to help them document and code their visits appropriately. In response to this, we have created a tool to help our providers. The tool will be embedded in our outpatient electronic medical record (EMR), and when a provider opens the encounter, it will reveal the relevant diagnoses for their patient, show them where the diagnoses came from, and make it easy to document the Monitor, Evaluate, Assess, and/or Treat (MEAT) and put the diagnosis on the claim. We will be going live with this system in the next eight weeks.
Even with such a tool, it is always important to educate your providers about the risk models. For our doctors, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) model is the most common risk model used.
I would like to end with an outpatient CDI tip for your providers: CKD 3 is once again an HCC! It has a very small weight, but considering how common CKD 3 is in our population, this is a gift to many providers.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: many hospitals and state Medicaid plans, under pressure from HR1 data analysis needs, are paying eye-watering markups to for-profit CPA and
As discussed last week, payments to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are adjusted to account for expected healthcare resource consumption by enrollees. Higher risk scores increase
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
