It is important for coders and all healthcare professionals to know the difference, and why it matters.
Intravenous therapy (IV) is quite common, administered by healthcare professionals on a very regular basis. As common as it may be, however, it’s linked to an unusually high risk of potential harm to the patient. If a complication occurs, a patient could develop a severe wound, lose function of a limb, or even suffer amputation. Understanding the difference between infiltration and extravasation is essential for healthcare professionals, and just as significant for coders.
What is the difference between infiltration and extravasation?
Whether infiltration or extravasation, both involve an IV solution or medication getting into the tissue surrounding the vein. It is the type of solution or medication that is inadvertently delivered into the surrounding tissue that determines the difference.
Infiltration is the unintentional administration of a non-vesicant medication into surrounding cell tissue. This is a relatively common and generally minor occurrence. Infiltration does not usually cause harm, but the medicine or solution may cause redness, swelling, and discomfort around the site.
Extravasation refers to the unintentional administration of a vesicant medication into the surrounding tissue. These are active chemical substances that can cause blistering, and in extreme cases, necrosis. It is not uncommon for a patient to receive a local injection of a reversal agent if extravasation occurs. If left untreated, the patient may have to have debridement or skin grafting, or he or she could suffer disfigurement, loss of function, and even amputation.
It is important to note that infiltration and extravasation can exist at the same time. Doctors often use infiltration and extravasation interchangeably. Both are caused when the vein leaks or the IV catheter comes out of the vein; however, extravasation is far more severe. Again, the essential difference between infiltration and extravasation is the type of medicine or fluid that is leaked. Extravasation is much more severe than infiltration due to vesicant agents within an IV solution.
Vesicant Agents
It is important to know if the substance that got into the tissue is a vesicant agent. Vesicants and non-vesicants are the two classes of IV solutions. In both IV solutions and medications, however, vesicant agents are highly reactive chemicals that cause cellular-level changes, resulting in serious or even life-threatening complications.
For coders, when determining if there is a code-able occurrence, the agent that has infiltrated must be taken into account. Further considerations include this question: was it treated, or did it impact the stay?
Coders must identify vesicant agents. Some common examples of vesicant medications and fluids include vancomycin, potassium chloride, calcium gluconate, dopamine, and Dilantin. This type of data may not always be easily accessible. If the coder is in doubt, they must take it one step further – utilize Internet resources, contact a supervisor, or leverage the expertise of a clinical documentation improvement (CDI) colleague. Information can be accessed through the utilization of resources. It is important to leverage all available resources to obtain a true and accurate diagnosis.
Accurate coding and documentation of infiltration and extravasation requires a complete understanding of the difference between the two, and may warrant a more comprehensive examination. For coders, additional efforts may be required to ensure accuracy, in consideration of the many areas that are dependent upon the codes, such as the reputation and quality of the organization, as well as research, and certainly reimbursement.
In keeping up with the expanding complexities of coding and the direct effect codes have on diagnosis assignment, more than ever before, coders must utilize critical thinking skills and all available resources.
Programming Note: Listen to Susan Gatehouse report this story live during Talk Ten Tuesdays today, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
I think many have heard me discuss a common scenario with which hospitals are grappling: patients who are medically ready for discharge, but have no
Last week I wrote about querying for the type of acute encephalopathy, and I’d like to continue this week. Please know, when I use the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
