CMS Documentation Requirements for Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery

Medlearn Media NPOS Non-patient outcome spending

CMS has published a booklet on this procedure.

Recently I was asked to assist with an audit that was to focus on clinical documentation for major joint replacement surgery, specific to the hips and knees.

Of course, I immediately thought about some information and guidance (a booklet) published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in November 2020, though it originated in 2017. With the volume of attention devoted toward the COVID-19 pandemic and the related changes to healthcare policies, procedures, and practices, you might not have gotten into the CMS 2020 guidance (Medicare Learning Network, or MLN) and how it applies to your facility operations and practices – so now is the time (see the link at the end of this article).

Major joint replacement or reattachment is a high-volume Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG). CMS has had many auditing entities – including the Recovery Auditors (RAs), Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) contractors, the Beneficiary and Family Centered Quality Improvement Organization (BFC-QIO), and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) – performing reviews, all focusing on these joint replacement MS-DRGs. Medical necessity, quality of care, and compliance are always aspects of following CMS guidance.

This Major Joint Replacement CMS guidance outlines what specific clinical documentation should be included in the history and physical (H&P) and pre-/post-operative documentation, which is something with which physicians (providers) and hospital staff should be very familiar. This CMS information would be great to include in provider education activities, such as those conducted by coding and/or clinical documentation improvement (CDI). 

The following outlines the CMS H&P documentation elements listed in the booklet.

The history should include information such as:

  • A description of the pain (onset, duration, character, aggravating, and relieving factors);
  • Limitation of specific activities of daily living (ADLs);
  • Safety issues (for example, falls);
  • Contraindications to non-surgical treatments;
  • A listing, description, and outcomes of failed non-surgical treatments, such as – trial of medications (for example, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – weight loss – physical therapy – occupational therapy – intra-articular injections; as well as:
    • Braces, orthotics or assistive devices;
    • Physical therapy and/or home exercise plans; and
    • Assistive devices (for example, cane, walker, braces and types, and orthotics).

The physical examination should describe the joint examination with detailed objective findings, such as:

  • Any deformity;
  • Range of motion;
  • Crepitus;
  • Effusions;
  • Tenderness; and
  • Gait description (with or without mobility aides).

CMS further states that investigations should include the results of applicable tests (for example, plain radiographs and pre-operative imaging studies). Consultation records should also be kept for any associated co-morbidities, for example, cardiology consult, or diabetes management pre-, intra-, and post-operatively.

In addition, CMS also wants documentation to include “a statement of clinical judgment with reasons for deviating from a stepped-care approach.”

The CMS Major Joint Replacement booklet also contains guidance regarding pre- and post-operative documentation, and information to include in the health record (medical record), for which it provides several examples.

One other item that CMS describes in this booklet is the post-acute care transfer policy (PACT), which pays as transfers all cases assigned to certain DRGs if the patient was discharged to a psychiatric hospital or unit, an inpatient rehabilitation hospital or unit, a long-term care hospital, a children’s hospital, a cancer hospital, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), or a home health agency (HHA). This is another area on which to focus to achieve accuracy and compliance when conducting reviews. Also, remember that validation of the discharge disposition status code is important to include in your reviews/audits.

If your facility (hospital) performs these surgeries, reading over the CMS booklet would be a wise step to take. Run a data report on the specific MS-DRGs for a year and determine your volume; this will be helpful in conducting a review/audit. Here is a list of MS-DRG upon which you can focus:

  • 469   Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity With MCC
  • 470   Major Joint Replacement or Reattachment of Lower Extremity Without MCC
  • 461   Bilateral or Multiple Major Joint Procedures of Lower Extremity With MCC
  • 462   Bilateral or Multiple Major Joint Procedures of Lower Extremity Without MCC
  • 466   Revision of Hip or Knee Replacement with MCC
  • 467   Revision of Hip or Knee Replacement with CC
  • 468   Revision of Hip or Knee Replacement without MCC/CC

In addition, even if you have already read this CMS booklet, look over the November 2020 version and utilize it when conducting a review/audit – and determine if your clinical documentation is meeting the CMS Major Joint Replacement requirements. Both coding and CDI professionals would be ideal to conduct this type of review and engage in ongoing education.

The Medicare Learning Network®, MLN Connects®, and MLN Matters® have registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS).

About the author: Gloryanne has worked in the HIM Coding and CDI areas of healthcare for more than 40 years. She currently is an independent Coding and CDI Consultant.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCDS

Gloryanne is an HIM coding professional and leader with more than 40 years of experience. She has an RHIA, CDIP, CCS, and a CCDS. For the past six years she has been a regular speaker and contributing author for ICD10monitor and Talk Ten Tuesdays. She has conducted numerous educational programs on ICD-10-CM/PCS and CPT coding and continues to do so. Ms. Bryant continues to advocate for compliant clinical documentation and data quality. She is passionate about helping healthcare have accurate and reliable coded data.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24