The dual settlements represent the Department of Justice’s continued crackdown on possible False Claims Act violations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation reached an over $642 million-dollar agreement to resolve claims of violating the False Claims Act (FCA). The company based out of East Hanover, New Jersey was involved in two settlements. The first settlement resolves allegations that the company illegally used three foundations as channels to pay the copayments of Medicare patients who were prescribed two of their drugs, Gilenya and Afinitor. The second brings resolution to an alleged payment kickback scheme to doctors.
“Through this settlement and others, the government has demonstrated its commitment to ensuring that drug companies do not use kickbacks to influence the drugs prescribed by doctors or purchased by patients,” said Assistant Attorney General Jody Hunt of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division in a Department of Justice (DOJ) press release. “We will continue to safeguard the Medicare program from kickbacks and their pernicious effects, including the undermining of important cost-control mechanisms instituted by Congress.”
With the first settlement, the company agreed to pay $51.25 million for resolution regarding the illegal payments of copay obligations for patients taking their prescriptions. Under Medicare beneficiary policy, when using a covered prescription drug, the beneficiary could be required to make a partial payment in the form of a copayment, coinsurance, or a deductible. These requirements were established as part of a strategy to provide a check on healthcare expenditures. This includes the prices that pharmaceutical manufacturers require for their drugs.
The drug Gilenya was approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) while Afinitor is used as a second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and also as a treatment for progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin (PNET).
In the case of Gilenya, Novartis apparently was informed in 2012 by the contractor managing the free drug program for Gilenya that over 300 patients receiving free prescriptions at the time would have Medicare eligibility in 2013. According to the allegations, Novartis and the contractor schemed to transition those patients to Medicare Part D, allowing Novartis to be reimbursed through Medicare when those patients filled their Gilenya prescriptions in the future. With full knowledge that patients would be unable to afford the copay for the drug, the company created a plan with a foundation that enabled Novartis to cover patient copays.
Furthermore, the company allegedly laid specific plans for payments to be made to the foundation. The actions were coordinated with the opening of the foundation’s MS fund at 6:00 PM on a Friday, with contractor personnel working overtime allowing them to submit applications for those patients prescribed free Gilenya. This resulted in a disproportionate share of the funding being directed to Gilenya patients during 2013.
With the second settlement, the pharmaceutical company is expected to pay $591,442,008 for resolution regarding a scheme of kickback payments to doctors. The company allegedly encouraged them to prescribe the Novartis drugs Lotrel, Valturna, Starlix, Tekturna, Tekturna HCT, Tekamlo, Diovan, Diovan HCT, Exforge, and Exforge HCT. Novartis will also relinquish $38.4 million under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Statute.
Along with the payments, Novartis also provided comprehensive factual admissions in the settlement while agreeing to severe limitations on future speaker programs, such as drastic reductions to the budget spent toward these programs.
“For more than a decade, Novartis spent hundreds of millions of dollars on so-called speaker programs, including speaking fees, exorbitant meals, and top-shelf alcohol that were nothing more than bribes to get doctors across the country to prescribe Novartis’s drugs,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss for the Southern District of New York in the press release. “Giving these cash payments and other lavish goodies interferes with the duty of doctors to choose the best treatment for their patients and increase drug costs for everyone. This office will continue to be vigilant in cracking down on kickbacks, however, they may be dressed up, throughout the pharmaceutical industry.”
The settlement also resolves a lawsuit entitled United States ex rel. Bilotta v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., No. 11-Civ.-0071-PGG (S.D.N.Y.). The lawsuit was first filed under the whistleblower provision of the FCA. For part of this settlement, Novartis reached an agreement to pay an additional $48,151,273 for the resolution of state Medicaid claims.
Simultaneously with the FCA settlements, Novartis agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement (CIA) with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). The CIA intends to deal with the actions in both settlements. The agreement mandates the reduction of the number of paid speaker programs and the budget of the programs while limiting the circumstances under which they may occur, including restrictions to a virtual format. Additionally, measures must be in place that show and promote independence from any patient assistance programs that Novartis contributes to. Overarching multi-faceted monitoring of the company’s operations will also occur.
As often is the case in these scenarios, the claims listed and resolved through legal settlements remain allegations only with no true determination of liability.
To read the DOJ press release in its entirety, which includes further details on each of the settlements go online to https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/novartis-pays-over-642-million-settle-allegations-improper-payments-patients-and-physicians
Programming Note: Listen to whistleblower attorney Mary Inman report this story live during Monitor Monday, July 13, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Gloryanne Bryant has more than 40 years of experience in her field and is an independent HIM Coding and CDI Consultant who works
Medicare, like many other insurers, often pays doctors a standardized rate based on the service they performed. Open heart surgery costs $X, a blood test
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
