What’s the Deal with Medical Notes?

What’s the Deal with Medical Notes?

Incomplete medical notes can have a significant impact on the revenue cycle.

So, what’s the deal with medical notes?Why are they so important, and why are they difficult for providers to complete?

In our last report, we highlighted the significance of eligibility and pre-authorization and provided tips to streamline the process for more efficient revenue collection. This month, we take a step further and delve into the importance of medical notes in the revenue cycle management (RCM) process. 

Medical notes are an essential part of the RCM process, and the information is used to ensure accurate billing and reimbursement for services rendered. The revenue cycle process can be hindered without accurate medical notes, resulting in lost revenue. The cost of poor note-taking can be high, as it can lead to billing errors and increased expenses.

Incomplete notes –> healthcare costs skyrocket

A study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that incomplete medical notes were associated with longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. The study analyzed more than 20,000 hospital admissions and found that incomplete notes were associated with a 0.4-day increase in length of stay and an additional $1,386 in hospital costs per patient.

Incomplete notes –> 5-20 percent loss of revenue per provider

A survey conducted by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) found that incomplete or missing documentation can result in a 5-20-percent loss of revenue for healthcare providers. This can be due to a variety of factors, such as denied claims, delayed reimbursement, or lost charges.

Physicians may try to stay proactive in completing notes in a timely manner, but often fall behind with high patient volumes. Common daily patient tracking methods include spreadsheets or notes on pieces of paper. Paper is often set aside and forgotten in a stack of other paper. Excel spreadsheets seem to be the next step up, but is it really a step up?Figures in an Excel spreadsheet are often isolated, and take a much higher degree of technical skill to format into usable data. And with multiple physicians in a practice, often servicing multiple clinic and hospital locations, with new patients coming in daily, detailed notes and physician attestations can fall off the radar quickly. 

When factoring in denials, rejections, and variations in specialties, a rule of thumb for the value of the average claim ranges between $75 to $100 per encounter. So, the losses can add up quickly if notes are not complete, nor attested by the provider.

Incomplete or non-attested notes are becoming much more common

Sometimes, it comes down to a need for oversight. The clinical informatics team auditing a university specialty department found that one of its physicians did not sign more than 3,000 notes. Depending on whether any of those encounters were still submissible at the point of discovery, the potential revenue loss was $300,000. For just one physician. The more physicians to track, the more patient notes at risk of being left behind. It gets complex quickly. With more and more patients coming in daily, detailing notes (which we know is a necessity) becomes a lesser priority.

In a private specialty practice, a provider had not signed 922 notes at one clinical location over a 10-month period. Averaging $100 per encounter, the private practice was at risk of losing $92,200. If that provider’s actions were consistent across their multiple locations, the losses could have bankrupted the practice.

To help organize and flag incomplete encounters, many practices turn toward today’s newer technologies. One such technology, TiaStat’s RCM transparency platform, helps members of the practice capture every eligible encounter by guiding the physician, office staff, coders, and billers through the process, and highlighting missing elements.

Incomplete notes increase the risk of malpractice and put patient care at risk

Notes aren’t just about reimbursement. The impact of poor note-taking can also lead to errors in patient care, such as incorrect medication dosages or missed diagnoses. This can result in additional medical expenses, increased risk of malpractice lawsuits, and patient harm. Consider:

  • Incomplete medical notes can result in delays in patient treatment. According to a survey of healthcare providers, 27 percent reported that incomplete or inaccurate documentation had delayed patient care.
  • Incomplete medical records are a common factor in medical malpractice lawsuits. According to a survey of malpractice claims, documentation errors were involved in 22 percent of cases.

To reduce the financial, legal, and patient impact of poor note-taking, healthcare organizations should provide regular training for staff on proper documentation techniques, standardize documentation practices, incorporate electronic health records (EHRs), monitor the documentation quality, and incorporate technologies that flag missing or incomplete notes, with some technologies going as far as overseeing the accuracy of coding and billing to mitigate errors.

A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association found that incomplete documentation in EHRs was associated with increased malpractice risk. The study analyzed more than 5,000 malpractice claims and found that incomplete documentation was a contributing factor in 7.4 percent of claims.

What’s the difficulty? It takes time

The American Medical Association (AMA) estimates that the average physician spends 13.1 hours per week on paperwork, including documentation and other administrative tasks. This can make it difficult for physicians to find the time to complete medical notes accurately and efficiently.

What is the RCM impact of incomplete medical notes on a practice? 

Incomplete medical notes can have a significant impact on the revenue cycle of a practice, leading to reduced revenue and increased costs. Aside from the examples of the impact of missing medical notes on revenue cycle (shared above), below are statistics of how incomplete medical notes can impact the revenue cycle:

  • Billing errors: Incomplete medical notes can lead to billing errors, which can result in denied claims, delayed payments, and lost revenue. According to a survey of healthcare providers, 13 percent reported that incomplete or inaccurate documentation had resulted in denied claims.
  • Increased administrative costs: Incomplete medical notes require additional administrative work to review, correct, and resubmit claims. This can result in increased staffing costs and reduced productivity. According to a survey of healthcare providers, 36 percent reported that incomplete or inaccurate documentation had resulted in duplication of efforts.
  • Increased audit risk: In the same survey, it was shown that incomplete medical notes increased the risk of audits and investigations by 36 percent, which is costly and time-consuming.

Overall, completing medical notes in a timely and accurate manner is crucial for providing quality patient care, ensuring legal compliance, securing eligible reimbursement in a timely manner, and maintaining efficient workflow in the healthcare system at a time when staff resources are strained.

Today’s technologies have the ability to measure productivity of providers within a practice, track compliance, and assist in recordkeeping. Some technologies help streamline, organize, and highlight missing or incomplete notes.

The return on investment (ROI) on this is immediate, as the technology is able to capture all eligible reimbursements to maximize revenue, and redirect staff resources back to patient care.

Programming note: Listen to Susie Vestevich report this story live today on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 Eastern with Chuck Buck and Dr. Erica Remer.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Susie Vestevich, Esq.

Susan A. Vestevich, JD, is the chief operations officer for Tia Tech (USA). She focuses on disruptive healthcare technologies and solutions, including new program rollouts as well as physician/client engagements.

Related Stories

What the End of Chevron Deference May Mean to Us

What the End of Chevron Deference May Mean to Us

During the last week of June, the U.S. Supreme Court unraveled the 1984 decision Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Chevron has been one of

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Heart Failure Coding Essentials: Ensuring Compliance and Optimal Reimbursement

Heart Failure Coding Essentials: Ensuring Compliance and Optimal Reimbursement

Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.

February 26, 2025
Decoding 2025 OPPS Charge Capture and Coding Complexities: Strategies for Success

Decoding 2025 OPPS Charge Capture and Coding Complexities: Strategies for Success

Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.

January 29, 2025
Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.

November 21, 2024

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.

March 20, 2025

Rethinking Observation Metrics: Standardizing Data for Better Outcomes

Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.

February 25, 2025
Navigating the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Key Changes and Strategies for Success

Navigating the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule: Key Changes and Strategies for Success

The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.

January 21, 2025
Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.

December 5, 2024

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24