Let’s start with some history because it’s the only way to make sense of why I’m writing about U.S. Supreme Court cases related to commercial fishing today. Congress makes bills. The president signs these bills into law. These laws often specify only broad goals and have inherent ambiguity. Executive agencies are then charged with developing operational regulations consistent with the statutes.
So, where does Chevron come in? In 1984, the Supreme Court decided Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. It’s an important case. It has been cited nearly 20,000 times by courts and nearly 100,000 times in briefs. The central question in the suit was what the limitations of agency interpretation of statutes were. The case has been crucial to the efficient functioning of executive agencies for 40 years. The decision has also allowed Congress to draft intentionally broad legislation so details can be left to agencies. In short, the decision, based on resolving ambiguous legislation, has encouraged 40 years of more ambiguous legislation.
At issue is a deceptively simple question, and that is who gets to interpret the law when a statute is ambiguous? “Chevron deference” imposes a two-part test. First, a court must determine if a law is ambiguous. If it is unambiguous, then the court must follow it. If the law is ambiguous, then the court determines whether the agency interpretation is “reasonable” or “permissible.” Under Chevron, a court must accept a reasonable interpretation. But courts may reject unreasonable agency interpretation of ambiguous statutes.
The Chevron doctrine arose because judges seemed to be partisan in interpreting regulations. This resulted in widely disparate interpretations across various courts. Without Chevron, the courts are essentially the policymakers. One might legitimately ask: what’s the difference between a politically appointed judge making a policy decision and a politically appointed agency employee? The main difference is that administrative agencies use highly trained experts to interpret and carry out federal laws. A judge? Well, he or she is just a lawyer without billable hours.
In 2000, the Major Questions Doctrine, which I’ve reported on before, added an additional limitation to agency authority. The doctrine requires that courts presume that Congress does not delegate issues of major political or economic significance unless the delegation is explicit.
So, what happens if the current Supreme Court overturns Chevron?
First, there’s 40 years of ambiguous legislation that would be subject to litigation. A prime example is inpatient care. Nothing in healthcare is more ambiguous than the definition of an inpatient. The current operational definition belongs to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), not the Social Security Act, and everyone seems to hate it. Without Chevron, it’s subject to litigation.
Second, there may be wide disparity in District Court outcomes.
Consider a very real possibility that the Two-Midnight Rule could be accepted, rejected, or modified in different jurisdictions. Consider the possibility that every hospital that refunded money in a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) or Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation now wants remediation of a potentially unnecessary refund.
Based on oral arguments, it seems that Chevron will be changed. We have the possibility that monolithic federal regulations could be reduced to regulatory rubble.
There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore
EDITOR’S NOTE: Gloryanne Bryant has more than 40 years of experience in her field and is an independent HIM Coding and CDI Consultant who works
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
