This is the last installment in my debrief about the annual ACDIS Conference held last month in Chicago. Trey La Charité, Medical Director for Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) and Coding at University of Tennessee Medical Center in Knoxville, gave a great talk on trauma service documentation.
He explained that CDI in trauma is important because many mortality-related cases stem from such services, and many such patients have no prior history with the facility, so comorbidities from prior encounters may not be discoverable. I pointed out that even if many trauma patients do not have health insurance, they increase the case mix index, which factors into the blended base rate.
Trey also mentioned the “halo effect,” which refers to the wider impact improved documentation can have. Surgical residents can take their CDI knowledge to other service lines, and trauma attendings usually also perform elective surgeries.
Specific advice was that every injury should be documented, because you never know what is going to throw the case into the Multiple Significant Trauma DRG. I think it is also important because medical necessity for specific tests and procedures often requires thoroughness in accounting of all injuries. One doesn’t order imaging of a right wrist for a ruptured spleen.
Additionally, he recommended documenting the separate Glasgow Coma Score components; his institution does so electronically by including a section in their trauma template. He also pointed out the importance of appropriately grading all solid-organ injuries. He stressed that it is important to specify presence and type of shock.
Words matter. “Mid-line shift” and “mass effect” need to be translated to “brain compression.” “Tear” indexes to laceration, but the word “rent,” does not. I say providers need to ascribe, not describe. Why is the kidney function abnormal? Why are the liver enzymes elevated? Why are you administering blood products?
He also addressed airway protection. My contribution here is that airways may need to be protected from blood, secretions, vomitus, redundant or swollen tissue, or foreign bodies. Airway protection is a proactive action; you are anticipating a problem.
Once you’ve cleared a path from the outside to the inside, for airway protection, you shouldn’t really need to ventilate or oxygenate. If you do need to do so, then you likely have some degree of respiratory failure. He offered the surgeon’s verbiage of “intubated for impending respiratory failure.” I objected to using the word “impending.”
The Official Guidelines discuss “impending.” If there is a subentry term for “impending” or “threatened,” then you can code that. If there is not, you need to determine if the condition really occurred or not. You code the condition if it developed, or you code signs/symptoms/other established conditions if the impending condition did not develop. There is no code for “impending respiratory failure” or “impending sepsis.”
If a patient is not exchanging air because there is airway obstruction or a severely decreased respiratory rate, you have respiratory failure. You needn’t wait for a catastrophic blood gas to prove the patient succumbed to hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia.
Examples of my suggestions for verbiage would be:
If the provider knows which type of respiratory failure it is, hypoxic or hypercapnic (or both), they can (and should) add that detail.
Surgeons need to understand that acute respiratory failure has a huge impact on severity of illness and risk of mortality scores, and it does not have to be on the basis of a pulmonary derangement.
It is beneficial to educate surgical advanced practitioners, in addition to the residents, because they often do the lion’s share of the documenting. There are various ways by which education can be provided: lunch-and-learns, flyers or posters, emailing documentation tips of the week, or elbow rounds, but Trey’s experience was similar to mine. He found that participating in trauma morbidity and mortality review conferences gave the best bang for his buck. There is usually great attendance, and you can point out how the performance metrics could have been impacted.
I hope you learned something from what I got out of the ACDIS Conference this year.
Having worked in clinical documentation integrity (CDI) in a variety of roles, I have heard a lot of advice when it comes to the timing
Let’s talk about the term “attending physician.” The simplest definition is the physician primarily responsible for a hospitalized patient’s care. While there may be many
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
