Atrial Fibrillation versus Atrial Flutter – Coding Considerations

Atrial Fibrillation versus Atrial Flutter – Coding Considerations

Today we are going to take a look at atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: the difference between the two, the different types, and how to code them. 

First, there’s what is the same – atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter are both arrhythmias of the heart that originate in the atria. Both conditions may also share some of the same etiologies and symptoms. 

According to cardiovasculardiseasehub, atrial fibrillation is more complex, with a more irregular rhythm than atrial flutter. This is due to the electrical signals in the atria becoming disorganized, which is what makes the atria “fibrillate” or quiver, instead of contracting as normal. This then leads to that irregular rhythm noted in atrial fibrillation. In atrial flutter, on the other hand, the atria beats very rapidly, but in a regular pattern. An electrocardiogram can show differences as well. In atrial flutter, the ECG shows P waves in a “sawtooth” pattern. In atrial fibrillation, an irregular rhythm is noted, without those P waves identified.  

Atrial fibrillation and flutter share common etiologies of hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease. “AFib,” as it is commonly called, can also be due to hyperthyroidism and sleep apnea, and is more common in those over 65; the incidence increases with age. A flutter can also be seen in patients who have had a previous heart surgery. Both conditions share common symptoms of palpitations, fatigue, dizziness, shortness of breath and chest discomfort. Both conditions also raise the patient’s risk of a stroke, but the risk is greater with atrial fibrillation due to the nature of the electrical impulses and the higher likelihood of blood stasis in the atria. 

According to WebMD, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurs when the heartbeat returns to normal within seven days, either with or without treatment. We would assign I48.0 for paroxysmal AFib. Persistent AFib lasts longer than a week and would be coded to I48.19. If the persistent AFib is documented to be longstanding, it has lasted more than a year and has not resolved. Longstanding, persistent AFib would be coded to I48.11. We also do have some Coding Clinic guidance on atrial fibrillation I would encourage you to review. The edition published for the second quarter of 2019 instructs us that when there are various types of AFib documented, we should only assign one code for the specific type of AFib, since some of the terms are less specific and some of the types can’t clinically occur together. It also notes that permanent AFib is persistent or longstanding when cardioversion as a treatment is not indicated or can’t be performed. Permanent AFib would be coded to I48.21. 

In coding atrial flutter, we can assign I48.92 for unspecified atrial flutter in addition to options for typical or type 1 atrial flutter and atypical or type 2 atrial flutter. According to WebMD, typical atrial flutter is more common (as the name would suggest). This type also involves the tricuspid valve and causes abnormal electrical signals in the right atrium. Typical atrial flutter would be assigned to I48.3. Atypical atrial flutter can occur in either the right or the left atrium, and it does not involve the tricuspid valve. Atypical atrial flutter would be assigned to I48.4. WebMD does note that atrial flutter that comes and goes could be referred to as paroxysmal atrial flutter, and flutter that continues for a longer period of time could be considered persistent atrial flutter. We do not have codes for this specificity…yet.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC

Chris began her health information management career in 1986, working in hospitals and as a consultant. With expertise in ICD-10 coding, audits, and education, she has contributed to compliance reviews and coding programs. She holds a Master's from Washington University, a B.S. from Saint Louis University, and has taught coding at Saint Louis University. Chris is certified in HCC risk-adjusted coding and is active in health management associations.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24