Is Knowing Clinical Criteria Sufficient to be a CDIS?

The practice of medicine takes clinical criteria into consideration, but clinical judgment can override criteria.

As I was deleting emails one morning, I saw a picture of Cynthia Tang, as in Pinson & Tang, authors of the annually updated CDI Pocket Guide.

I had never met her, so I was surprised. It used to happen to me a lot in the emergency department – you talk to a doctor almost every day and formulate a picture in your head of what the person behind the voice would look like, and then the first time you meet him at a work event, you are shocked to see that he has a bushy red beard and is toweringly tall.

I then noticed the title of her article, which really turned out to be more of a plug for their CDI Pocket Guide, “Positioning Coders for CDI Success.” Let me preface this by stating that some of the best clinical documentation improvement specialists (CDISs) I have known came from the health information management (HIM) world and were not nurses. Ms. Tang said, “coding specialists, not just nurses, can and should perform the CDI function.” She further stated that “just as CDI specialists benefit from learning coding guidelines and principles, coding specialists can and should learn the clinical criteria.”

I agree that the best CDI specialists understand and stay current on coding guidelines and principles. They also have excellent relationships with their coding colleagues and are not reluctant to ask for input or explanations of the coding rules. I also believe that coding specialists can and should learn clinical criteria. Again, it makes them better at their job.

But clinical criteria are only one facet of clinical medicine. If we were really able to distill medicine down to clinical decision tools, we wouldn’t need clinicians. Watson, the supercomputer, really could replace doctors.

However, that is not the case. There are some diagnoses that are made strictly by a positive test or by checking boxes in a set of clinical criteria. An X-ray with a fracture line indicates a broken bone. A urinary tract infection (UTI) that grows out E. coli >100,000 CFU signifies an E. coli UTI. A creatinine reading of 5.0 indicates renal failure (be it acute or chronic). Rheumatoid arthritis requires inflammatory arthritis of three or more joints, positive rheumatoid factor, duration of more than six weeks, elevated CRP or ESR indicating an inflammatory process, and inability to attribute symptoms to a different condition. Even with distinct decision points, there is often room for exception. And even with distinct diagnostic criteria, there is often room for clinical judgment.

The best example I can offer is sepsis. Sepsis is not a disease process that can be diagnosed by a set of abnormal vital signs and laboratory tests. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is not the definitive means to make the diagnosis. Sepsis is a clinical syndrome recognized by competent clinicians trying to prevent out-of-control infections from resulting in death. It has a multitude of presentations, the commonality being organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to a localized infection. Learning and scouring for clinical criteria may capture some of the cases, but it will miss others that require a keen clinical eye.

Can coders have a clinical eye? Absolutely. Ask Lisa Lorenzi and Kathy Murchland, ex-colleagues who are shining examples of coders-turned-savvy-CDISs. It takes the ability to read charts and recognize patterns, an inquisitiveness to encourage clinicians to share their thought processes, and it takes experience. I do not believe that a newly trained coder without previous medical exposure (e.g., was a paramedic in a previous lifetime) could serve as a CDIS. I believe it takes some years of scrutinizing medical records, reading literature, and trying to glean the story from the documentation. I think the best way to learn is from reviewing cases and having a clinician explain what they often don’t document. Why did you think that? How did you know that the condition was present or ruled out? What were you looking for when you did this test? Why didn’t you think they had that disease?

CDI is really about reading between the lines, finding the diagnoses that are intimated, but not asserted in the record. It is about following the narrative and timeline, and clinically validating whether the documentation and diagnoses make sense. When I do a chart review, my brain is trying to piece together the clinical indicators to make hypotheses, to see if I can deduce what is going on, and then see if the documentation confirms it, refutes it, or just misses the boat. This is not easily taught, nor can it be written down in a 250-page “CDI Bible.”

Coders who want to be CDISs can do several things to achieve their goal:

  • Use clinical criteria as guidelines, not indisputable rules. Recognize that there are exceptions, and try to understand why, in this case, the providers didn’t think the indicators were consistent with that clinical condition, even though the clinical criteria would have suggested it was present.
  • Talk to providers and nurse CDISs to have them explain their thought processes. Have them present clinical topics at your staff meetings. Attend society conferences where clinicians are presenting. Read articles that have case studies or case reports. Establish a relationship with a provider or physician advisor, and bounce questions off them. See if you can join elbow rounds on occasion.
  • Examine the chart like a reader, not like an editor or proofreader. Try to understand the story; don’t just be scanning for missing CCs or MCCs. Don’t just accept or reject computer-assisted codes.

The practice of medicine takes clinical criteria into consideration, but clinical judgment can override criteria. There are many useful reference books and websites, but they are not going to make anyone a clinician; it takes understanding of the pathophysiology and keeping the patient front and center at all times. Clinical documentation integrity specialists, be they nurses or coders, would do well to remember this.

Programming Note: Dr. Remer co-hosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck every Tuesday at 10 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24