More than physician payment rules in the CMS IPPS proposal
The physician fee schedule rule is one of many payment system rules that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issues each year.
There are also rules for the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS), Outpatient PPS, Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs), home health, and durable medical equipment (DME) payments. This year brings a common theme to these proposed rules.
Each rule includes three items that should catch our attention – interoperability requirements, reductions in paperwork, and reduced/improved quality measures.
CMS has changed the electronic health record (EHR) requirements for hospitals and physicians to focus on achieving interoperability, both with other EHRs and in providing data directly to patients. This builds on CMS efforts accomplished through the Blue Button 2.0 initiative to ensure that not only claims data but clinical data is available through application programming interfaces (APIs) and other tools, enabling both patients and providers to have access to the widest possible range of data for treatment purposes. In addition to payment and policy proposals, CMS is releasing a request for information to obtain feedback on solutions to better achieve interoperability or the sharing of healthcare data between providers. In the IPPS rule, specifically, CMS is requesting stakeholder feedback through a request for information on the possibility of revising Conditions of Participation related to interoperability as a way to increase electronic sharing of data by hospitals.
CMS is also focusing on providing paperwork reductions for a variety of providers. The new proposed Physician Fee Schedule rule recommends a significant reduction in the documentation requirements for evaluation and management (E&M) services by eliminating the different levels for E&M and instituting a single payment. In another example, as part of the SNF PPS, the agency is proposing a Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM), an innovative new system for SNF payment that ties payment to patients’ conditions and care needs rather than volume of services provided. PDPM would simplify complicated paperwork requirements for performing patient assessments by significantly reducing reporting burdens, saving facilities approximately $2 billion over 10 years. A similar model is being proposed for home health.
CMS has reviewed many of the quality measures for providers and is moving to eliminate many process measures, instead focusing on measures that are better linked to successful outcomes. One example for hospitals is that CMS removed the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and the Safe Surgery Checklist Use due to cost and outcome concerns. For home health, CMS is proposing the elimination of seven quality measures in the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HHQRP) by 2022.
All these changes have been published as proposed rules, allowing for public comment. The public comment period has closed for inpatient and outpatient hospital proposed rules, but is still open for the physician rule, the DME rules, and the home health agency rules. For the rules that are still open for public comment, I highly recommend reviewing them and providing relevant comments to CMS, whether you agree or disagree with the proposals. CMS takes public comments seriously and is obligated to review each one they receive. Many proposed rules have been modified when published as final rules due to public comments.
As these are all proposed and not final rules, no significant action should be taken to meet the stated requirements until they become final for the 2019 payment year.
Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals work in a variety of settings, and although I mostly focus on topics related to hospital inpatient billing, this week
With so much focus within the federal government on abuse, fraud, and waste, I thought it might be helpful to review a couple of federal
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
