HCCs thrive on specificity and ICD-11 will provide a higher level of specificity than in ICD-10.

For those of you who are coding for hierarchical condition category (HCC) purposes, you know that HCCs are categories of related ICD-10 codes. Only selected significant conditions to drive a payment HCC. That means only conditions that present at a high enough frequency to predict long-term costs of care and are specific enough, are included in those payment categories. The HCC payment categories only include approximately 10,000 of the 70,000+ ICD-10 codes. Many unspecified conditions are excluded from the payment HCCs.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has built its algorithms based in part on the codes submitted on claims to drive this reimbursement methodology. We all know that validating CMS data takes time, which means when ICD-11 kicks in, a whole new algorithm may be needed. But let’s table that thought momentarily.

HCCs thrive on specificity, and ICD-11 will definitely provide that. ICD-11 is designed as an electronic health record (EHR)-compatible database that will link with the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine – Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) (Stearns 2016), which is already a component of many of our EHRs.

Structurally, the ICD-11 code differs from the ICD-10 format and utilizes a suffixing approach to add attributes to the stem or foundation code. An example of a stem code is type 1 diabetes. Other codes are appended to the stem to describe the disease, such a Type 1 DM with diabetic retinopathy. By using additional “X” extension codes, the final coding will capture specificity for laterality, severity, present-on-admission status, morphology, anatomy, or whether the condition is related to the patient’s family history.

Because ICD-11 is built on SNOMED-CT and embedded in the EHR, we will be able to use SNOMED’s artificial intelligence (AI) deciphering capability to determine whether conditions are symptoms or manifestations, what the stage of condition is, whether it’s related to a substance or organism, or whether it’s associated with an event, among other attributes. SNOMED’s vast medical vocabulary is capable of “reading” the clinician entries and interpreting clinical expressions (e.g., “doubtful encephalopathy.”)

So, in essence, ICD-11, with its 55,000 codes, plus SNOMED-CT’s 300,000 concepts is ICD-10 on steroids! So, let’s circle back to HCCs, and ICD-11’s impact on them. CMS is intimately involved in the World Health Organization’s implementation of ICD-11. CMS built its algorithm on what was submitted on claims. It is very likely that CMS’s team of analysts have already begun to use (or soon will be using) SNOMED and other tools to convert their extensive database of ICD-10 codes to ICD-11. So we need to give them credit for thinking ahead.

But what has been happening to those SNOMED codes we have been capturing in our EHRs, in those problem lists? Are we data mining those codes and mapping them to payment HCCs? Can we use our own data and map to ICD-11 to see what the impact may be on our organization’s pool of HCC revenues? It may be challenging, but ICD-11, in its current version, is available for us to explore. 

If we think about the timeline for ICD-11 in the U.S., there is also adequate time for AI to become quite sophisticated in our EHRs. AI will be scouring digital documentation, seeking to surface potential codes for assessment by our coding professionals, and facilitating the linking of the stems to the attribute codes.

However, AI can scour all it wants, but it, like our coding for HCCs, requires documentation – and the looming question remains, at this time, unanswered: will the documentation rise to meet the specificity level that can be captured under ICD-11, and with SNOMED? I’m not a gambler, but this is a sure bet…it won’t!

That means there will be abundant opportunities for clinical documentation improvement activities. But to understand what we will need means that our coding and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) staff must understand ICD-11. Go to the World Health Organization’s site and start learning. Don’t wait until it’s at our doorstep. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, CHPS, AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Rose T. Dunn, MBA, RHIA, CPA, FACHE, FHFMA, CHPS, is a past president of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and recipient of AHIMA’s distinguished member and legacy awards. She is chief operating officer of First Class Solutions, Inc., a healthcare consulting firm based in St. Louis, Mo. First Class Solutions, Inc. assists healthcare organizations with operational challenges in HIM, physician office documentation and coding, and other revenue cycle functions.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24