I am continuing my project, “A Question a Day Keeps the Query Away,” and today’s topic is functional quadriplegia. Let me preface this TalkBack with: this is an example of a coding construct that does not have a clinical diagnosis correlate. These types of diagnoses drive some physicians crazy. When I was taught about this diagnosis during my orientation to become a physician advisor for the CDI team, I relished being given a way to convey how sick and complex my patients were, but other clinicians may be purists.
On September 27, 2007, there was a presentation and discussion at the ICD-9 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting requesting a code for functional urinary incontinence and for functional quadriplegia. Those codes were granted, became effective October 1, 2008, and were also incorporated into ICD-10-CM. It was felt these codes would help the assessment of long-term nursing care needs.
Functional quadriplegia, ICD-10-CM code R53.2, is defined as being complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty caused by another medical condition, without physical injury or damage to the brain or spinal cord. The patient with functional quadriplegia requires assistance with all activities of daily living. My CDI friend, Katy Good, expresses it as a patient who is functionally quadriplegic due to an underlying condition. The Fall 2007 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting Summary notes documented Dr. Laura Powers from the American Academy of Neurology describing it as being “the inability to move due to another condition like severe contractures, arthritis, etc., and functionally you are the same as a paralyzed person.”
This is in contradistinction to the paralyzed patient with a cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury. The patient with a pontine hemorrhage who has locked-in syndrome and can only move their eyes. Those patients are structural, neurologic, or spinal quadriplegics. Their code set is found in Chapter 6, Diseases of the nervous system, G00-G99.
Examples of functional quadriplegia are the advanced dementia patient with contractures from disuse who has not been out of bed in years and the terminal Lou Gehrig’s disease patient. Patients may have multiple sclerosis or Huntington’s disease, profound intellectual disability, severe birth defects, or advanced musculoskeletal deformities such as severe crippling rheumatoid arthritis.
Verbiage or clues to the CDIS or coder that functional quadriplegia may be present include words like, “bedbound,” “bedfast,” or “bedridden,” which are coded as Z74.01, Bed confinement status, and notations from the physical, occupational therapist or bedside nurse that a patient requires total care, major assistance with all ADLs, or has a low Braden score specifically in terms of activity and mobility. The purpose of the Braden score is to prognosticate the risk of pressure ulcers.
My recommendation is to make sure that you offer some education to the provider prior to querying. The term, “functional quadriplegia,” may have no context for them if they have never been introduced to it.
If they need convincing that it really is a thing, present them with the article by Charilaou et. al., including our friend, Dr. Jim Kennedy, entitled, “Functional Quadriplegia: A Nationwide Matched Study of Trends in Hospital Resource Utilization and Associated Comorbidities,” found in the Annals of Long-Term Care from 2019. This article detailed how patients with functional quadriplegia had much longer lengths of stay and higher costs as compared to matched controls in similar DRGs who did not have functional quadriplegia.
The risk adjustment implications of functional quadriplegia are identical to those of structural or neurologic quadriplegia. Both are major comorbid conditions or complications (MCCs) and both land in Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC) 70.
If the hospital is going to have to expend resources to care for a severely impacted patient who is in the hospital for an extended amount of time, they should be able to get credit for it. Get the provider to use the term, functional quadriplegia, when it is applicable.
Today is Mardi Gras, which is French for “Fat Tuesday.” It is the last day before lent starts tomorrow, Ash Wednesday. This got me thinking
EDITOR’S NOTE: The narrative in this article reflects the firsthand perspectives and professional experience of Tami McMasters Gomez, curated and prepared for publication by Penny
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
