Federal Court Decides Appeal of NSA Lawsuit that Addressed QPA Calculation

Federal Court Decides Appeal of NSA Lawsuit that Addressed QPA Calculation

Back in August, you may have heard my colleague Cate Brantley review the latest in a string of lawsuits over the legitimacy of the No Surprises Act (NSA) and its implementing regulations.

The suits, four in total, were brought against the federal government by the Texas Medical Association (TMA) in a district court in Texas, and were all heard by the same presiding judge.

In general, the cases covered issues around the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) calculation method, the weight given to the QPA in arbitration decisions, guidance for grouping disputed services, and the fees associated with filing for arbitration.

You may also recall that the TMA “racked up a series of wins” in these cases, which has already prompted major changes in the law’s implementation, as the judge ruled in the association’s favor in each of them.

Subsequently, in two cases, the government appealed the rulings, one of which (the second lawsuit, or TMA II) they’ve already lost. That left one final appeal – on TMA III – to be decided before closing the loop.

Last Friday, an appeals court did just that, ruling on the government’s appeal of the TMA III lawsuit and handing the government its first (partial) victory in the four lawsuits.

Let’s take a quick look at what was at stake.

In the TMA III case, the providers argued against certain provisions in the NSA that addressed how health plans must calculate their QPAs, taking issue with certain factors being included in that calculation. They also suggested that additional information about QPAs should be provided by health plans.

Following the appeals court’s ruling, we now know once and for all that the QPA can be considered in the following ways:

  1. Calculation can include contracted rates with providers that have not provided or may never provide items/services, aka “ghost rates;”
  2. Calculation cannot include “special, case-specific agreements” with providers/facilities;
  3. Calculation cannot include risk-sharing/bonus/penalty/or other incentive-based and retrospective payments or adjustments;
  4. Calculation cannot use different provider specialties to determine a rate for a specific item/service; and
  5. The court also ruled that health plans do not have to send more information about their QPA than is currently required by the NSA’s regulations.

Additionally, one related issue the court did not take up, as the government chose not to appeal it, was whether a third-party administrator (TPA) could calculate a QPA based on an aggregate of all of the plans it services. In the initial TMA III case, the judge ruled that a TPA cannot calculate its QPA based on all of its plans’ contracted rates, so that is now the law of the land as well.

In the immediate future, this technically doesn’t amount to much. The ruling means that for the government, its regulations are acceptable as written in each of the instances I just mentioned, so the NSA’s rules will not have to be re-drafted or altered.

But with the four main No Surprises Act lawsuits now final, we’ll likely see opponents turn to other methods of attacking the law.

There are several separate pieces of litigation moving through the courts as we speak that will determine whether the NSA affords providers the right to sue in court over arbitration awards handed down under the law’s dispute resolution process, and lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives just recently introduced legislation with bipartisan support that would increase penalties on health plans for late final payments following arbitration decisions.

So, much has already been decided, but there is still so much more yet to come. Providers and plans should stay tuned, as the sands continue to shift.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Adam Brenman

Adam Brenman is a Sr. Gov’t Affairs Liaison at Zelis Healthcare. He previously served as Manager of Public Policy at WellCare Health Plans, where he led an analyst team in review, analysis, and development of advocacy materials related to state and federal legislation/regulatory guidance. He holds a master’s degree in Public Policy & Administration from Northwestern University and has also worked as a government affairs rep/lobbyist for a national healthcare provider association.

Related Stories

Potentially Suspicious Link Uncovered

Potentially Suspicious Link Uncovered

There has been a noticeable increase in payer actions regarding readmission denials, often justified as efforts to enhance quality of care and align with Medicare’s

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.

November 21, 2024
Comprehensive Inpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Comprehensive Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.

September 5, 2024
Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.

September 12, 2024

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.

December 5, 2024
Navigating the No Surprises Act & Price Transparency: Essential Insights for Compliance

Navigating the No Surprises Act & Price Transparency: Essential Insights for Compliance

Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks.  Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.

November 19, 2024
Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.

October 24, 2024
The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.

September 19, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →