Providers and the CDC may be setting up a coding-clinical disconnect.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Erica Remer reported this story live during the Nov. 19 edition of Talk Ten Tuesday. The following is an edited transcript of her reporting.
Since I don’t practice clinically anymore, it is challenging to keep up with current medical best practices. Occasionally, I get emails from societies, which I scan for topics that interest me, and over the weekend, an edition of the ACEP (the American College of Emergency Physicians) Weekend Review popped up in my email.
The article, titled, What You Need to Know About Vaping-Associated Pulmonary Injury, led to an online electronic publication, ACEP Now, and it details the outbreak of lung injury we are seeing as a result of vaping, reported by Joshua Farkas, MD. Laurie Johnson has been reporting on this for us at ICD10monitor, and has told us that the term the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has adopted for the condition is EVALI, or electronic cigarette/vaping associated lung illness. The ACEP article refers to the condition as “vaping-associated pulmonary injury,” or VAPI.
The unfolding of this condition in real-time is fascinating for the medical community (but it is never good, in medicine, to be “interesting”). It reminds me of when I was in medical school when this new condition called acquired immunodeficiency syndrome was discovered. But EVALI is being recognized, investigated, and acted upon exponentially faster than AIDS was.
The problem is that providers and the CDC may be setting up a coding-clinical disconnect. Proposals for a new code for this medical condition are planned to be presented at the ICD-10-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting in March 2020. If a code for EVALI is established and the indexing corresponds, but the term VAPI takes hold in the clinical community, our data may be flawed, because we may miss cases. Either the providers need to transition to using the acronym EVALI, or we need to make sure that “vaping-associated pulmonary injury” and “VAPI” are legitimate inclusion terms.
The funny thing about the Farkas article is that it links to the CDC Update page: Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Evaluating and Caring for Patients with Suspected E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use Associated Lung Injury – United States, October 2019, which utilizes EVALI as the acronym. It would have been a good idea for the author to mention that the acronyms did not match. I felt compelled to leave a comment on the site pointing this out. I also suggested that it would be optimal for providers to type in “EVALI,” and their electronic medical record should output an enterprise-wide acronym expansion, “EVALI (electronic cigarette/vaping lung illness).” This leaves no ambiguity or doubt to the reader. Hopefully, this condition will not become widespread, and future providers will not be familiar with it (or its acronym).
Another related article from the CDC is worth mentioning. Cigarette Smoking Among U.S. Adults Lowest Ever Recorded notes that the rate of cigarette smoking is at an all-time low of 14 percent. This is great news because It is believed that cigarette smoking leads to approximately one-third of cancer deaths. However, 47 million adults still use some type of tobacco products, when you add in the electronic and smokeless products.
Sometimes it takes time to identify all the harm a behavior poses. EVALI may turn out not to be the only risk. The contribution of vaping to cancer is not yet clear.
Programming Note:
Listen to Dr. Erica Remer live during Talk Ten Tuesday every Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
Today is Veterans Day, so first I would like to thank those who have served or are currently serving in the military for their service
September is the annual Suicide Prevention Month which is also a reminder to examine our coding considerations. In March of this year, the Centers for
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
