Providers and the CDC may be setting up a coding-clinical disconnect.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Erica Remer reported this story live during the Nov. 19 edition of Talk Ten Tuesday. The following is an edited transcript of her reporting.
Since I don’t practice clinically anymore, it is challenging to keep up with current medical best practices. Occasionally, I get emails from societies, which I scan for topics that interest me, and over the weekend, an edition of the ACEP (the American College of Emergency Physicians) Weekend Review popped up in my email.
The article, titled, What You Need to Know About Vaping-Associated Pulmonary Injury, led to an online electronic publication, ACEP Now, and it details the outbreak of lung injury we are seeing as a result of vaping, reported by Joshua Farkas, MD. Laurie Johnson has been reporting on this for us at ICD10monitor, and has told us that the term the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has adopted for the condition is EVALI, or electronic cigarette/vaping associated lung illness. The ACEP article refers to the condition as “vaping-associated pulmonary injury,” or VAPI.
The unfolding of this condition in real-time is fascinating for the medical community (but it is never good, in medicine, to be “interesting”). It reminds me of when I was in medical school when this new condition called acquired immunodeficiency syndrome was discovered. But EVALI is being recognized, investigated, and acted upon exponentially faster than AIDS was.
The problem is that providers and the CDC may be setting up a coding-clinical disconnect. Proposals for a new code for this medical condition are planned to be presented at the ICD-10-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting in March 2020. If a code for EVALI is established and the indexing corresponds, but the term VAPI takes hold in the clinical community, our data may be flawed, because we may miss cases. Either the providers need to transition to using the acronym EVALI, or we need to make sure that “vaping-associated pulmonary injury” and “VAPI” are legitimate inclusion terms.
The funny thing about the Farkas article is that it links to the CDC Update page: Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Evaluating and Caring for Patients with Suspected E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use Associated Lung Injury – United States, October 2019, which utilizes EVALI as the acronym. It would have been a good idea for the author to mention that the acronyms did not match. I felt compelled to leave a comment on the site pointing this out. I also suggested that it would be optimal for providers to type in “EVALI,” and their electronic medical record should output an enterprise-wide acronym expansion, “EVALI (electronic cigarette/vaping lung illness).” This leaves no ambiguity or doubt to the reader. Hopefully, this condition will not become widespread, and future providers will not be familiar with it (or its acronym).
Another related article from the CDC is worth mentioning. Cigarette Smoking Among U.S. Adults Lowest Ever Recorded notes that the rate of cigarette smoking is at an all-time low of 14 percent. This is great news because It is believed that cigarette smoking leads to approximately one-third of cancer deaths. However, 47 million adults still use some type of tobacco products, when you add in the electronic and smokeless products.
Sometimes it takes time to identify all the harm a behavior poses. EVALI may turn out not to be the only risk. The contribution of vaping to cancer is not yet clear.
Programming Note:
Listen to Dr. Erica Remer live during Talk Ten Tuesday every Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
Today is Veterans Day, so first I would like to thank those who have served or are currently serving in the military for their service
September is the annual Suicide Prevention Month which is also a reminder to examine our coding considerations. In March of this year, the Centers for
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
