“Can we code and bill for both a CT and CTA on the same day?”
This is one of the most frequently asked questions when we talk about diagnostic imaging. The answer? Technically, yes, and yet the answer is not that straightforward. With many situations there’s generally a ‘but’ with these types of answers and here the documentation needs to be crystal clear in order to submit codes for both exams.
Before we get to those documentation requirements, a quick review.
Computed tomography (CT) scans take cross-sectional images of soft tissues or skeletal anatomy. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) takes the CT scan a step further by creating cross-sectional images of soft tissues, skeletal anatomy, and vascular structures. After the scan is complete, computer post-processing is used to create 3D images.
This 3D post-processing is the key distinction between a standard CT and a CTA.
The imaging of the vessels alone is not necessarily considered a CTA for coding purposes. To report a CTA code, 3D post-processing must be done to evaluate the vessels – if there is no 3D reformatting performed to evaluate the vessels, then the exam should be coded as a CT and not a CTA. If the details in the documentation are unclear as to whether the exam should be coded as a CTA vs. a CT, it’s always best to request clarification. Even though a physician may identify a procedure as a CTA, that’s not always the case from a coding perspective.
Code selections should be made based on the services provided and detailed in the documentation.
For situations where a CT and a CTA are performed on the same day, the NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services says the following in Chapter IX, Section D:
“Computed tomography (CT) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) procedures for the same anatomic location may be reported together in limited circumstances. If a single technical study is performed which is used to generate images for separate CT and CTA reports, only one procedure, either the CT or CTA, for the anatomic region may be reported. Both a CT and CTA may be reported for the same anatomic region if they are performed at separate patient encounters or if two separate and distinct technical studies, one for the CT and one for the CTA, are performed at the same patient encounter. The medical necessity for the latter situation is uncommon.”
But there are some important things to consider before coding a CT and CTA together.
First, if the intent was to perform a CTA, then only the CTA should be coded. Any non-contrast CT images taken during a CTA (i.e., for localization purposes) are considered a part of the CTA and should not be coded separately.
Second, CT and CTA can both be coded and billed only if separate full and complete studies are done.
A separate set-up and separate acquisition would be one in which the patient position in the scanner is different from the first study and different acquisition parameters are used.
Documentation should clearly indicate and account for the separate technical studies performed and there should be medical necessity for each before coding for both a CT and a CTA.
A scenario where it would be appropriate to report both a CT and a CTA on the same day are for patients where a stroke is suspected, and a full and complete CT is done of the head along with CTA of the brain and/or the neck.
Clinical Examples in Radiology (Volume 4, Issue 3, Summer 2008) also offers an example where a CT reveals a tumor on the head of the pancreas and a CTA is recommended and performed on the same day for further evaluation. Of course, documentation must clearly support that the studies were full, separate and complete. And remember, just because we are able to code for it doesn’t necessarily mean everything will be paid, that is going to be based on payer policies.
So, can we code and bill for a CT and a CTA on the same day? Yes, but be sure the documentation clearly indicates full, separate studies were performed and modify as necessary.
It’s all in the CT/MR Coder, your one-stop solution. Designed to specifically respond to real-world coding, documentation and billing issues for a full range of CT/MR services with workable solutions, translated into clear-cut instruction, actionable tips and case examples – an invaluable resource for radiology providers.
I’ve recently encountered a couple of discussions about encephalopathy so I thought others might be interested in this topic. First up, querying for the type
For decades, armies of medical coders have served as the translators of American healthcare, converting physician notes and hospital encounters into ICD, CPT®, and HCPCS
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
