Coding Update for Acidosis Introduced

The move was prompted by nephrologist petitioners.

On Oct. 1 we saw an expansion in the code set of acidosis. I last wrote about this in July 2020 (seems like a lifetime ago, doesn’t it?!) We will revisit it now with an excerpt from my upcoming book.

An acid is a compound that can donate a hydrogen ion. It usually exists in some equilibrium, as the acid and its ionized parts, free positively charged hydrogen cations, and negatively charged conjugate base anions (e.g., HCl dissociates into H+ and Cl). The stronger the acid, the more dissociated the solution, with more free hydrogen ions available.

pH is based on the concentration of H+ ions in a logarithmic form. The lower the pH number (e.g., pH of 3 versus 7), the stronger the acid. Normal blood pH is 7.4. Hydrogen ions are particularly reactive and can affect the structure and function of proteins, which is why homeostasis to maintain pH narrowly between 7.37 and 7.43 exists.

Acidosis is the overarching process, and acidemia is the state where measuring the hydrogen ions in the bloodstream will yield a result of less than 7.35. Acidosis also refers to the condition at the tissue level. Practically speaking, if a patient is acidemic, the state of acidosis likely also exists, so many use the words interchangeably.

There are acids found normally in the human body, including lactic acid and carbonic acid (H2CO3), derived from glucose and glycogen. Carbonic acid is the intermediary in the chemical reaction that water and carbon dioxide undergo to become H+ cations and HCO3 anions (bicarbonate) [CO2 + H2O ↔ H2CO3 ↔ H+ + HCO3].

If the body is in a starvation state such that glucose is not readily available, such as in malnutrition or alcoholic bingeing, or if the person cannot utilize their glucose (such as a diabetic), ketoacidosis can develop because the body preferentially uses fatty acids as their energy source. Acids that are considered pathologic in excessive quantities, such as acetoacetic acid and beta-hydroxybutyric acid, are found in ketoacidosis states.

When metabolic chemical reactions result in the excess of hydrogen ions, the condition is called metabolic acidosis. Examples are alcoholic and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), starvation ketosis, lactic acidosis, certain toxins, kidney failure, and the loss of gastrointestinal bicarbonate, such as in prolonged diarrhea.

When an organism cannot exchange carbon dioxide in the lungs or ventilation decreases, with either a fall in respiratory rate or decrease in ventilatory volume, respiratory acidosis ensues. The carbon dioxide dissociates into bicarbonate (dissociated cation) and hydrogen cations and the pH drops (hence, acidosis).

If a patient has acidosis, the body (i.e., the kidneys) tries to compensate by retaining bicarbonate, which can buffer the excess hydrogen ions and/or excrete hydrogen ions hitchhiking on ammonia. If there is metabolic acidosis, the body can try to compensate by increasing ventilation, which eliminates carbon dioxide via the lungs (N.B.: this is why DKA demonstrates Kussmaul breathing – deep, rapid breathing, trying to blow off acid). The thing to remember is that the body tends to want to normalize, but overcompensation doesn’t occur. If a person has a primary respiratory acidosis, they don’t overcompensate to become alkalotic.

As noted, earlier this month the ICD-10-CM code set expanded regarding acidosis. Nephrologists petitioned for and received a chronic metabolic acidosis code. The options for metabolic acidosis are acute (E87.21), chronic (E87.22), and unspecified, at E87.20. Although “respiratory acidosis” indexes to E87.29, Other acidosis, respiratory acidosis with specified acuity indexes correspondingly to acute or chronic respiratory failure.

My opinion is that when acidosis is part of the definition or the clinical criteria for a condition, acidosis is considered integral to it, and does not get separately coded. Some conditions have explicit Excludes1, like diabetic ketoacidosis. Hypercapnic respiratory failure requires a pH of less than 7.35, which is, by definition, acidosis. Septic shock has a criterion of lactate exceeding 4 mmol/L. E87.2-, so acidosis would not be coded separately with these conditions.

If a condition indexes under a general term coded at E87.2-, like acidosis or acidemia, it is considered integral to it. Examples are renal tubular acidosis or propionic acidemia. They code elsewhere, but they are indexed below E87.20. I’ll go out on a limb and say if “acidosis” or “acidemia” appears in the name of the condition, it is considered inherent to it.

However, some genetic disorders of the metabolism can have variable manifestations and severity. If an inborn error of metabolism may have lactic or other metabolic acidosis as a component, but it is not necessary for the diagnosis (and it doesn’t fulfill any of the preconditions noted above), and a patient is experiencing metabolic acidosis requiring attention, then it is a legitimate secondary diagnosis. It should be captured because E87.2- explains resource utilization.

All E87.2- diagnoses are comorbid conditions or complications (CCs), provided that the principal diagnosis is not an acid/base, with signs of fluid derangement (E86- or E87-). Coders’ primary responsibility is to determine whether it is inherent to the underlying condition or a clinically valid independent diagnosis. A query may not be the best way to resolve this, because many providers don’t understand coding rules. Check with your friendly physician advisor!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24