Last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) gave itself a very bad report card on how it did during the first year of the No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution, or IDR.
As you may know, the No Surprises Act, or NSA, protects patients from out-of-network (OON) billing in cases of emergencies or surprise OON care provided in hospitals.
The NSA then leaves payors and providers to work out reimbursement for themselves for these claims. If the provider and the payor can’t work it out, CMS has set up this IDR, whereby providers can make their case before third-party arbitrators on what the reimbursement should be.
Now, when compared to all of the medical claims in the country, even when compared to all of the out-of-network claims in the country, the NSA IDR process handles relatively very few.
OON claims only make up between 10 to 30 percent of total medical claims.
Of those OON claims, only 20 to 30 percent are true surprise billing claims, wherein the patient did not voluntarily choose to go out of network (that is, claims that should fall under the NSA).
Even of those claims that fall under the NSA, only about 3 percent of them actually end up in the IDR arbitration process. For the great majority of NSA claims, the provider and payor agree upon, at some point, an appropriate rate for those OON claims.
One more statistic: of those claims that make it to IDR, three-quarters of them are claims from only 10 providers, most of them large physician staffing organizations.
So, what’s the big deal? Why are there headlines on this, lawsuits, and congressional hearings about an arbitration process that resolves reimbursement for a teeny tiny category of claims for a teeny tiny number of providers?
This may be bad reporting style, but let’s come back to that question after we talk about CMS’s bad report card on the IDR.
Over the past year, CMS reports that about 335,000 disputes were initiated in the IDR. That’s nearly 14 times what CMS estimated the caseload would be in their regulations.
Of those, the arbitrators have only made decisions on 13 percent.
Now, if this were your kid’s report card, it wouldn’t be an F; it would be an incomplete, right, because that statistic means that your kid has only taken about one out of the 10 quizzes that were given this semester.
Now, back to why the IDR is important. If the NSA arbitrators tend to decide that in-network rates are appropriate reimbursement for OON providers, in certain regions, for certain services – or, alternately, if they decide that above-network rates are appropriate in certain regions, for certain services – that’s important for providers and payors to know when they’re making decisions about network participation.
The reimbursement patterns of the NSA IDR decisions – the decisions of this small category of out-of-network claims – is just one data point, but as we know, in the marketplace now are all sorts of reimbursement data points that have been freed by the transparency rules. For the first time ever, providers and payors alike are looking at real data on what is being charged and negotiated, and using that to think strategically about reimbursement.
Said succinctly, when it comes to claims reimbursement, the future is in the data.
But you can’t tell whether your kid is any good at math if he or she has only taken one out of 10 quizzes, and we can’t yet get a grasp on what these IDR arbitrators are deciding if they’ve only decided on 13 percent of the claims.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has launched the Rural Health Transformation (RHT) Program, a $50 billion, five-year federal initiative to strengthen healthcare
Many healthcare facilities have implemented processes that require clinical documentation integrity (CDI) staff to review all patients as quickly as possible to establish a working
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
