The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced a new approach to penalties applied under the Hospital Price Transparency rule. Before I describe that, it may be helpful to try to bring some clarity to the potentially confusing pricing provisions launched in the last few years.
There have been two distinct pricing provisions. This article focuses on price transparency regulations, which are found at 45 C.F.R., Part 180. These regulations are different from the No Surprises Act (NSA), which was passed with the main goal of assuring that patients going to an in-network facility or obtaining emergency care out-of-network are not balance-billed. But the NSA also requires the provision of good-faith estimates for a broader range of patients. Right now, good-faith estimates only go to patients who aren’t using insurance to pay for their care, either because they are uninsured or because they are choosing not to use their insurance for a particular service. The good-faith estimate applies broadly to licensed healthcare entities and professionals.
The price transparency regulations, which were issued in November 2019, are different. First, they only apply to hospitals. Second, rather than applying to specific patient encounters, they set up a broad requirement for hospitals to post information about their pricing. For example, CMS has specified 70 specific shoppable services for which prices must be posted online, and each hospital is given the opportunity to choose an additional 230 services, so that 300 shoppable services are posted. A shoppable service is planned medical care, something you can schedule, like a knee replacement or delivery of a child. (Ok, maybe you don’t always schedule the delivery of a child, but you have enough warning to price shop.)
In addition, there’s a requirement to make tremendous volumes of pricing data about nearly all of your services available in a machine-readable format. Among the information that must be provided are the gross charges for a service, as well as specific negotiated contract rates for each payor, and you must specifically identify the highest and lowest negotiated charges. Finally, you have to provide information about your discounted cash price. In short, you need to provide a lot of data, and in different formats – some easily accessible to the public, others readable by computer.
When the price transparency regulations were first issued, the penalty for noncompliance was $300 a day, leaving many organizations to figure they would simply pay the fines rather than post the information. As a result, CMS increased the penalty, so it can reach $5,500 a day for hospitals with 550 beds. In short, the government wanted some teeth behind this requirement.
Now that there are teeth, the government is going to bite away. Last week, federal officials indicated that they were going to continue heightened emphasis on the Price Transparency rule.
CMS has now announced that they have issued 730 warning notices and 269 requests for corrective action plans. They are conducting approximately 200 comprehensive reviews of hospitals each month. Going forward, hospitals are expected to submit a corrective action plan within 45 days of a request, and come into full compliance within 90 days of the date they were asked to provide a corrective action plan. In other words, if you take 45 days to write the plan, you have 45 more to implement it.
Historically, the government was issuing warning letters before demanding a corrective action plan. Now, however, if CMS feels that an organization didn’t make a real effort to comply with the rule, they will not issue any warning. You will get an immediate demand for a corrective action plan, and compliance within 90 days of that demand will be forthcoming – or else.
The bottom line is that if you been procrastinating on the Price Transparency rule while humming Wilson Phillips’s “just hold on for one more day,” don’t. Because if you keep stalling, it is highly unlikely that “things will go your way.”
Healthcare has been transitioning toward a more digital, interconnected ecosystem for many years, but the pace and magnitude of current changes represent a fundamental shift.
Has anyone asked you to remember a short list of words, in this case certain nouns? Well, recently, my husband and I were reading some
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
