With reimbursement pressures mounting, coding accuracy has never been more critical as the system remains strained and faces a storm of uncertainty heading into 2026. Abdominal IR procedures such as thoracentesis, perinephric drain placement, and tunneled peritoneal catheter insertion carry significant compliance risks if coded incorrectly. Below, we present real-world sample cases, identified by our subject matter experts, with code assignments and rationale. Case studies remain a proven approach, offering valuable insights into coding scenarios that strengthen both accuracy and comprehensive understanding.
CASE 1: ULTRASOUND-GUIDED RIGHT THORACENTESIS, ULTRASOUND AND FLUOROSCOPIC-GUIDED RIGHT PERINEPHRIC DRAIN PLACEMENT
History: 65-year-old male with bilateral nephrectomy most recently of the right kidney complicated by perinephric and perihepatic hematoma presenting with altered mental status and low-grade fever with CT KUB demonstrating persistent perinephric fluid collection with a small amount of gas and a small right-sided pleural effusion.
Procedure: Informed consent was obtained. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. The pleural effusion was localized using ultrasound guidance. A permanent ultrasound image was stored for documentation. Using 1% lidocaine anesthesia, a 19 G Yueh centesis needle/catheter was advanced into the pleural fluid under ultrasound guidance. A total of 440 cc of dark fluid was removed. The catheter was removed. Fluid was sent for the appropriate laboratory studies. Next, the patient was positioned prone on the fluoroscopy table. Ultrasound demonstrated a complex fluid collection in the right perinephric space with a small foci of gas. After the skin was anesthetized using 1% lidocaine, a 19-gauge Yueh centesis needle/catheter was advanced into the fluid collection. A 035 guidewire was then placed through the Yueh catheter into the collection, and the tract was serially dilated. A 10 French pigtail catheter was then exchanged over the guidewire under fluoroscopy guidance. 10 cc of dark blood was aspirated. The drain was sutured to the skin and placed to gravity drainage. The tube insertion site was covered with sterile dressing.
Complications: None apparent.
Conscious Sedation: 41 minutes of moderate conscious sedation was administered. Continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring was performed. Cardiorespiratory function remained stable throughout the procedure. Refer to sedation note for additional details.
Medications: 1.5 mg of Versed and 75 mcg of Fentanyl IV, 18 ml of 1% lidocaine SQ
Findings: Small right pleural effusion. Complex right perinephric fluid collection with small foci of gas that aspirated dark blood suggestive of an old hematoma.
Impressions:
32555 Thoracentesis, needle or catheter, aspiration of the pleural space; with imaging guidance
49405 Image-guided fluid collection drainage by catheter (e.g., abscess, hematoma, seroma, lymphocele, cyst); visceral (e.g., kidney, liver, spleen, lung/mediastinum), percutaneous
Two separate procedures were performed and documented. In the first, a catheter was used for pleural drainage under ultrasound guidance. Since the catheter was removed, code 32555 is assigned. In the second procedure, an indwelling catheter was placed for drainage. Although this is documented as a collection in the perinephric space and not the kidney itself, a parenthetical note in the CPT manual under code 50020 indicates that 49405 is the appropriate code for percutaneous drainage of perirenal area. Both 32555 and 49405 include guidance, so do not code a separate S & I code. Although conscious (moderate) sedation was performed and documented, code 49405 includes sedation, so codes 99144 and 99145 cannot be assigned.
CASE 2: MANAGEMENT OF ASCITES
History: Recurrent ascites. Patient now hospice and cannot get recurrent para. Need aspira for symptom relief.
Performing Physician: Dr P
Reference Air Kerma: 40mGy
Consent: The risks, benefits and alternatives of the procedure were discussed with the patient. The patient’s questions were answered. Consent was obtained.
Procedure Description: Using sterile technique, local lidocaine and utilizing concurrent real-time ultrasound visualization, access to the abdominal ascites was obtained using a Yueh needle. A 0.035 wire was advanced. This entry site was dilated sequentially. A peel-away sheath was placed. A separate skin incision was made in the abdominal wall. The PleurX catheter was tunneled subcutaneously and passed intra-abdominally through the peel-away sheath. The catheter was secured in place using 2-0 suture at its exit site from the dermatotomy. The 1st dermatotomy, overlying the initial abdominal puncture, was closed using skin glue. The patient tolerated the procedure well.
Impression: Successful aspira catheter placement for abdominal ascites.
CODE ASSIGNMENTS AND RATIONALE
49418 Insertion of tunneled intraperitoneal catheter (e.g., dialysis, intraperitoneal chemotherapy instillation, management of ascites), complete procedure, including imaging guidance, catheter placement, contrast injection when performed, and radiological supervision and interpretation, percutaneous
Code selection is based on location not the catheter name. As the report supports an abdominal catheter for ascites treatment, 49418 is the appropriate choice.
⚠️ Your 2025 IR Coding Remains Under Threat, Creating Significant Risk to Your Bottom Line. These Are NOT All the Tips and Tricks Necessary for Success.
With every dollar of reimbursement counting more than ever in the face of payment decline and complex changes, it’s imperative to make sure your CPT® coding is correct and compliant. Master more coding topics and break down the complexity with our 2025 Abdominal Interventional Radiology Coding Webcast live on September 10, 2025 at 11:00 am CT (120 minutes). This webcast is an essential training tool for both audio and visual learners.
For decades, clinical documentation integrity (CDI) programs have been synonymous with inpatient care. They evolved from early efforts to improve Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) accuracy into
When we think of November we think of fall and, most likely, Thanksgiving, but did you know that November 2025 is Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
