The goal should be a 100 percent response rate.
On a recent onsite, one of the clinical documentation integrity specialists (CDISs) asked me my opinion on how assiduous a clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professional should be to get a query answered. My response may surprise some of you.
I must preface my answer with the assertion that the goal should be to have a 100 percent response rate. I cannot understand the concept of a provider being asked a question in the clinical setting and refusing to answer. I also don’t get not making the effort to comprehend the question being posed so that one could make an informed decision.
Aiming for an 85 percent response rate means you are willing to leave 15 percent of your queries unanswered. Are you really willing to leave 15 percent of your queries unanswered? Then why did you compose them? If they were worthy of generation, they deserve to be answered and closed.
When I worked as a physician advisor in a large multi-hospital system, one of the smaller community hospitals had a large-volume admitter who elicited the lion’s share of queries. The CDIS had a standing appointment with his office for Friday afternoon and the provider would passive-aggressively make her wait in his waiting room for an inordinate amount of time before he would deign to meet with her. Sometimes she would wait, and he would ghost her. For those of you who do not know anyone in the dating world right now, ghosting means someone just doesn’t show up. They don’t text or call to cancel, they just don’t show.
That was his system. CDISs used to have to phone or text some providers and fax queries to others. They would email and send multiple reminder emails. They would track the providers down in the hallways. When we obtained an electronic CDI query system, some of them would use that.
I’d ask the CDISs why they had so many different processes, and their answer was, “Whatever it takes!”
Admirable, but unacceptable.
My surprising response is that the organization should develop a standard system for queries that fits into the providers’ workflow and stick with it. You can’t establish the procedure without practitioner input, but I oppose setting up differing systems for individual providers. The solution to a provider who doesn’t utilize the hospital email system or the inbox of the electronic health record (EHR) is to mandate utilization of the hospital email system or the inbox of the EHR. The medical administration needs to hold the providers accountable.
Most institutions have a medical records completion policy which includes repercussions like suspension for failure to comply in a timely fashion, say within 14 or 30 days. Queries are part of the medical record.
What we in CDI do is important and valuable to the provider and the system. Providers are not doing us a favor by answering our queries; we are, in essence, doing them a favor by sifting through their suboptimal documentation, finding opportunities, and presenting them for improvement, so that they get credit for taking care of as sick and complex patients as they do. The administration needs to facilitate the process and encourage cooperation. The provider and hospital’s quality metrics and financial viability may very well depend on it.
Program Note:
Listen to Dr. Erica Remer report this subject live today on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
A current movement within the clinical revenue cycle is putting utilization review and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) under the same reporting structure. There are many
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
