AI-powered solutions must align with applicable coding guidelines
Streamlining the nation’s healthcare system to provide the highest quality of care at a lower cost for patients should be the goal of all healthcare organizations.
While prioritizing this initiative, along with reducing waste and improper payments, much attention has been paid to the role of electronic health record (EHR) clinical documentation and outcomes reporting with respect to compliance. Value-based reimbursement models, reform policies, and even growing consumerism highlight the importance of compliant clinical documentation and coding practices.
We know, for example, that most improper Medicare payments can be attributed to documentation errors, from small mistakes like missing signatures to documentation that only reflects treatment and not the underlying diagnosis. Incomplete documentation means that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) cannot determine that the care provided was medically necessary, which leads to inappropriate reimbursements. At the other end of the spectrum, of course, are a small number of cases that overstate patient conditions and level of care, which is not just bad for patient care, but opens up the organization to other risks. Comprehensive documentation that captures accurate disease acuity in the patient population gives clinicians a more detailed picture of patient health to recommend better treatment plans and improve outcomes.
AI-powered Solutions to Managing EHR Clinical Documentation
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can support both physicians and clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists in their efforts to create comprehensive documentation that’s both accurate and compliant with CMS requirements.
At the point of care, AI-powered, computer-assisted physician documentation (CAPD) solution can augment physicians’ knowledge with evidence-based clinical decision support, helping identify critical undocumented and unspecified details and diagnoses. Specifically, the CAPD solution analyzes patient notes in real time, simultaneously reviewing the entire EHR to assess the patient’s full condition. As the physician builds the documentation, the CAPD interactively prompts the user with evidence-based clarifications that improve the quality of the documentation. When presented with these clarifications and the underlying basis for the recommendations, physicians rely on their own judgment to accept or reject each one; they have the final word.
Likewise, within the CDI workflow, clinically focused programs provide evidence-based clarification guidance and documentation decision support. Solutions bring CDI teams and physicians together in a clinical dialogue about each patient. Team reviews validate that all diagnoses are clinically supported and that coding rules are applied appropriately.
Technology Solutions Must Follow Applicable Laws and Coding Guidelines
Regardless of how clarifications are presented (in person, in physician workflow, or during the CDI process), they must be grounded in the guidelines promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and presented in accordance with all legal requirements.
Healthcare organizations must remain vigilant about the technologies they employ to support both documentation and compliance; clinical sources must be sound and coding practices must follow legal guidelines. Furthermore, there can never come a time when technologies replace the people in this process. No matter how far AI advances, the algorithms will always be designed to augment or amplify human intelligence. To be sure, AI will make physicians and CDI professionals more accurate and efficient, but technology can’t replace the human judgment that’s so critical to quality, patient safety, and compliance.
The integrity of clinical documentation affects everything, from patient care to quality scores, and even the ability to provide a defense against denials—and for these reasons, compliance remains at the top of everyone’s priorities list.
A well-designed CDI program coordinated by advanced-practice CDI professionals can serve as the guardrails here, helping manage the various risks involved while supporting accurate and compliant documentation. These safeguards will be the focus of our Part II in our series, coming next Tuesday.
Programming Note:
Listen to Mel Tully report this story live today on Talk Ten Tuesday, 10-10:30 a.m. EDT.
There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore
I often begin my day with an environmental scan. Last week, an article from Becker’s Clinical Leadership caught my eye, “Hospital mortality, infectionrates improve despite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
