Avoid Treating Patients Like Check Boxes on a List

Quality of care cannot be achieved without good data.
2020 has brought us many looming changes in healthcare. Unfortunately, we have already seen increased reporting criteria, more administrative burden, and many payment cuts. As we address all of these, not only this year but also in future years, we need to make sure we keep our eye on the prize. In our case, the prize is quality patient care.

Healthcare is quickly becoming overregulated, and reimbursements have steadily declined. We need more staff to do more tasks, in order to get paid less. There are many hoops we have to jump through to get services paid, to meet quality reporting initiatives, or to get services or procedures approved – all this to go along with the many other hassles that drain our practices. We must be careful to not allow ourselves to become desensitized to the grind.

Inevitably, I hear about practices that develop checklists or tasks designed to streamline those processes, and staff is trained on how to check the boxes, which are not always related directly to patient care. The signature task becomes how to get paid, not making sure the patient is treated correctly.

Let me share a story with you. My husband recently had an abnormal blood test. I didn’t go into his appointment with him, as I had my own appointment shortly after his. As he walked out, I looked at the stack of papers and orders for testing. You can imagine my panic when I saw the diagnosis of CKD, mild. Remember, this was simply one elevated test.

When I went into my appointment, I questioned the doctor. He told me he felt pretty certain that if it wasn’t that, then it was renal stenosis, and that I shouldn’t worry about the diagnosis, because he had “magic” software that kept the diagnosis from the health insurance company (go ahead, laugh: you know you want to).

Turns out, it was another culprit: a prescription drug that my husband was taking that elevated his numbers. Once that was discontinued, all was fine. But imagine our surprise when a month later, we were assigned a care manager through our health plan because of the diagnosis code used.

This provider actually has a history of using diagnosis codes that get services paid by the plan. He’s not the only one; I have run into it often, not to mention the countless similar stories I hear from others in healthcare.

We can’t treat patients like checkboxes on task lists. Administrative burdens are a struggle for all of us, but we have to approach the data and subsequent care of our patients with integrity. We need to really ask ourselves if those quick-buck ancillary services we have started offering to give us additional context for treating the patient – or would the treatment plan remain the same?

Quality of care should be key, and without good data, that cannot be achieved. That means documenting for the true clinical condition, and not for payer requirements, quality measures, or revenue enhancements.

Strategy is also key. Taking a day to educate staff on the clinical conditions you are offering goes a long way to understanding the intent behind the checkboxes. Staffing changes occur frequently, so this training should be repeated often, and incorporated as part of your compliance plan. Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) programs should be effective in spotting irregularities with problematic checklists, and robust enough to enable good reporting of any issues encountered.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Related Stories

Lessons Learned from ACDIS

Lessons Learned from ACDIS

Today and in two weeks, I am going to share some tips I picked up at the ACDIS National Conference in Chicago, May 9 through11.

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.

June 21, 2023
Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.

May 24, 2023

Trending News