Unfortunately, many in the industry took the assertion that “clinical validation is performed by a clinician (RN, CMD or therapist)” out of context. This was referencing RAC processes and who they have identified to perform clinical validation. It is up to every organization to create their own policy and procedure related to clinical validation. In reality, clinical validation is a multi-tiered process, and a piece of it is already being performed by CDI professionals with all different types of backgrounds.
CDI professionals should be reviewing clinical indicators to identify documentation gaps and/or discrepancies requiring clarification. But in the end, clinical validation should be performed in peer-to-peer fashion. As CDI professionals, we are not part of the clinical team, but are the liaisons between the clinical and coding worlds; as a result, we do not perform as a “peer” when issuing clinical validation queries. CDI professionals are trained on the job, regardless of their background, education, and credentials, to understand evidence-based definitions, rules, and regulations related to coding and industry standards so that these can be incorporated into their review process.
Final clinical validation requires provider-to- provider review. Since many providers do not understand the complexity of coding and documentation, it is very important for CDI professionals to become experts in both coding and clinical reviews. It is your knowledge that qualifies you as a clinical validator, not your credentials as a HIM coding professional or your credentials as a clinician.
Talk Ten Tuesdays is devoting the month of February to this critically important topic. It is asked to perform its signature task some 100,000
Predicting coding patterns using the HCC risk scores can be a valuable endeavor. EDITOR’S NOTE: Longtime RACmonitor contributing correspondent Frank Cohen, a senior healthcare analyst,
Copyright © 2022 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
