Are HIM Coding Professionals Qualified to Query for Clinical Validity? Part III

Progress has been noted on this issue since first reported last July by ICD10monitor.

Since the last Talk Ten Tuesday’s segment in August 2018 about whether HIM Coding Professionals are qualified to query for clinical validity, I am happy to announce that we are seeing some positive changes. Some organizations have started to modify their job descriptions to include additional credentials and backgrounds other than nursing. In addition, both the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and the Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS) are also expressing the importance of the clinical validator’s knowledge and not their credentials in journal articles. AHIMA has also published a revised practice brief titled, “Clinical Validation: The Next Level of CDI (January 2019 Update),” to clarify who can write clinical validation queries. Per the practice brief, “the qualifications of a professional who can send clinical validation queries will vary by setting and organization. Many organizations support both CDI and coding professionals as authors of clinical validation queries. Adequately trained query professionals should not be prevented from writing clinical validation clarification queries based on their credentials and/or background (e.g., HIM coding background versus clinical background).”

The topic on whether HIM Coding professionals are qualified to query for clinical validity has evolved over the years due to the evolution of the query process. The query process has become more complicated as healthcare organizations continue to evolve with the ever-changing reimbursement methodologies. Since the quality of patient care and claims data is now impacting reimbursement, the accuracy of provider documentation is now more important than ever. As healthcare organizations are facing more clinical denials, provider documentation is now under more scrutiny and all documented diagnoses must be supported by clinical indicators, treatment, and/or monitoring. As a result, many CDI departments now issue clinical validation queries.

A step in the clinical validation process involves a clinical review of a patient’s health record to identify any potential gaps between the documented diagnoses and the clinical evidence; which is a practice that many HIM Coding professionals have performed when coding a record and issuing a query. But at the end of the day, only a provider can truly validate whether a clinical condition is present or not, therefore many successful clinical validation processes consist of a multi-tier process that is supported by a multi-disciplinary CDI team.

By saying a multi-tier process, a CDI department may have a career ladder that incorporates the clinical validation process. Some organizations are having their senior CDI professionals issuing clinical validation queries, while the rest of the team performs the traditional CDI reviews. These senior CDI professionals, with either a clinical background or a HIM Coding background, will be the first line of defense in the clinical validation process. They will be the ones who will be identifying any potential clinical/documentation gaps and will be the ones issuing the clinical validation queries. The other team members of the clinical validation process will include the providers themselves, who will validate whether a clinical condition exists, and last but not least a physician advisor who may step in when a discrepancy occurs. There should always be an escalation process in place for CDI professionals to follow relative to clinical validation.

As we know the clinical validation process can be a very complicated process, therefore, everyone’s background and experience will add value to the CDI team. A successful CDI professional must possess strong critical thinking skills and have a strong understanding of clinical indicators, in addition to the many documentation requirements associated with specific reimbursement methodologies.

Documentation requirements is typically a learned skillset by professionals with a clinical background whereas it is a skillset that is already possessed by HIM Coding professionals. This understanding of documentation requirements associated with the reimbursement methodologies is critical because it is the foundation of any CDI professional to appropriately identify documentation gaps and to successfully prioritize query and education opportunities. A CDI professional should also be personable and be able to articulate the documentation needs to the provider with confidence, in which, this quality cannot be predicted solely by one’s credential. Therefore, wouldn’t it be fair to say that despite one’s credentials all CDI professionals will require some form of training in either coding and/or clinical process to adapt and/or understand how to look at a health record with a CDI lens.

As a CDI professional it is important to develop and foster any provider relationships no matter what credentials you may have. Mutual respect between providers and the CDI team is gained through one’s ability to share their knowledge in documentation requirements while successfully helping the provider in changing their documentation practices.

In closing, this subject of who can perform clinical validation remains “contentious” across the industry and a lot of changes still need to occur because it is still impacting a group of qualified candidates from being hired. There are still job postings and recruiter postings on social media that specifically highlight a specific type of candidates that can apply. This type of verbiage has caused many qualified candidates with backgrounds like HIM Coding professionals, foreign-trained physicians, respiratory therapists, etc. to be overlooked despite their other qualifications that may make them a stellar CDI professional. As Dr. Erica Remer said during the last Talk Ten Tuesday segment, “it’s not about the credentials but the knowledge of the clinical validator” that matters.

Comment on this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP

Anny Pang Yuen is currently the co-chair of the AHIMA CDI Practice Council and a certified coding specialist, clinical documentation specialist, and documentation improvement practitioner. Yuen is also a registered Health Information Advisor and is known as an author to many white papers, articles, and books.

Related Stories

New Online Drug Lookup Tool Unveiled

New Online Drug Lookup Tool Unveiled

MedLearn Media is launching an online resource believed to be useful for professional coders, charge capture, compliance, and revenue integrity specialists alike. DrugCode Pro is

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I050825

Mastering ICD-10-CM Coding for Diabetes and it’s Complications: Avoiding Denials & Ensuring Compliance

Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!

May 8, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.

May 15, 2025
Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.

April 17, 2025
Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.

March 20, 2025

Rethinking Observation Metrics: Standardizing Data for Better Outcomes

Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.

February 25, 2025

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24