Are HIM Coding Professionals Qualified to Query for Clinical Validity? Part III

It’s not the credentials, but knowledge of the clinical validator that counts.

Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals come from a variety of backgrounds and skill sets. Frequently, we see health information management (HIM) coding professionals and nurses stepping into the role of CDI. Their respective education and experiences help provide a core foundation for these professionals engaging in such an endeavor.
CDI requires training in understanding clinical documentation gaps. It is not often that someone can just step into the role and become a CDI professional overnight. There is a component of analytical skills involved with the job; therefore, if someone asks me whether HIM coding professionals are qualified to query for clinical validity, my response will always be “it is not the credentials (RHIA, RHIT, CCS, RN, etc.) or education background, but the knowledge of the clinical validator that matters.”
Often, many forget or are unaware that many HIM coding professionals were required to pass anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology courses prior to graduating from their accredited HIM programs. Additionally, there are many types of coders (inpatient coder, physician coder, emergency room coder, radiology coder, etc.) with different types of credentials (CCS, CPC, etc.) in the industry, as well as different levels of education. Similarly, there are many different types of clinicians (intensive care unit registered nurse, medical/surgical registered nurse, family medicine physician, surgical physician, etc.) with diverse levels of education and clinical experiences.
Therefore, it is unfair to assume that all HIM coding professionals lack clinical knowledge and are unable to perform clinical validations properly. Besides education and/or experience, what makes a successful CDI professional is analytical skills and ability to understand the role of CDI. Some people may not be successful in CDI despite their education and/or experiences due to their inability to grasp the fundamentals of CDI. The questioning of the qualifications of HIM coding professionals has also unintentionally created challenges for those who are trying to obtain roles in clinical validation and/or CDI.
As mentioned above, the skill set and years of clinical education may differ from person to person, but it is important for one to remember that many of us in the beginning of our careers as CDI professionals were trained by a seasoned HIM professional who possessed a wealth of knowledge about coding and clinical indicators they look for in supporting the coding of a diagnosis.
What stirred up this debate about the qualifications of HIM coding professionals was a statement issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) referencing clinical validation in 2013. This same statement was also later reiterated in the American Hospital Association’s (AHA’s) Coding Clinic and the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) publication Clinical Validation: The Next Level of CDI (December 2016 update). Per the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Scope of Work:

    “Clinical validation is an additional process that may be performed along with DRG validation. Clinical validation involves a clinical review of the case to see whether or not the patient truly possesses the conditions that were documented in the medical record. Recovery Auditor clinicians shall review any information necessary to make a prepayment or post-payment claim determination. Clinical validation is performed by a clinician (RN, CMD, or therapist). Clinical validation is beyond the scope of DRG (coding) validation, and the skills of a certified coder. This type of review can only be performed by a clinician or may be performed by a clinician with approved coding credentials.”

Unfortunately, many in the industry took the assertion that “clinical validation is performed by a clinician (RN, CMD or therapist)” out of context. This was referencing RAC processes and who they have identified to perform clinical validation. It is up to every organization to create their own policy and procedure related to clinical validation. In reality, clinical validation is a multi-tiered process, and a piece of it is already being performed by CDI professionals with all different types of backgrounds.

CDI professionals should be reviewing clinical indicators to identify documentation gaps and/or discrepancies requiring clarification. But in the end, clinical validation should be performed in peer-to-peer fashion. As CDI professionals, we are not part of the clinical team, but are the liaisons between the clinical and coding worlds; as a result, we do not perform as a “peer” when issuing clinical validation queries. CDI professionals are trained on the job, regardless of their background, education, and credentials, to understand evidence-based definitions, rules, and regulations related to coding and industry standards so that these can be incorporated into their review process.

Final clinical validation requires provider-to- provider review. Since many providers do not understand the complexity of coding and documentation, it is very important for CDI professionals to become experts in both coding and clinical reviews. It is your knowledge that qualifies you as a clinical validator, not your credentials as a HIM coding professional or your credentials as a clinician.

Comment on this article

 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP

Anny Pang Yuen is currently the co-chair of the AHIMA CDI Practice Council and a certified coding specialist, clinical documentation specialist, and documentation improvement practitioner. Yuen is also a registered Health Information Advisor and is known as an author to many white papers, articles, and books.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24