Are HIM Coding Professionals Qualified to Query for Clinical Validity? Part III

It’s not the credentials, but knowledge of the clinical validator that counts.

Clinical documentation integrity (CDI) professionals come from a variety of backgrounds and skill sets. Frequently, we see health information management (HIM) coding professionals and nurses stepping into the role of CDI. Their respective education and experiences help provide a core foundation for these professionals engaging in such an endeavor.
CDI requires training in understanding clinical documentation gaps. It is not often that someone can just step into the role and become a CDI professional overnight. There is a component of analytical skills involved with the job; therefore, if someone asks me whether HIM coding professionals are qualified to query for clinical validity, my response will always be “it is not the credentials (RHIA, RHIT, CCS, RN, etc.) or education background, but the knowledge of the clinical validator that matters.”
Often, many forget or are unaware that many HIM coding professionals were required to pass anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology courses prior to graduating from their accredited HIM programs. Additionally, there are many types of coders (inpatient coder, physician coder, emergency room coder, radiology coder, etc.) with different types of credentials (CCS, CPC, etc.) in the industry, as well as different levels of education. Similarly, there are many different types of clinicians (intensive care unit registered nurse, medical/surgical registered nurse, family medicine physician, surgical physician, etc.) with diverse levels of education and clinical experiences.
Therefore, it is unfair to assume that all HIM coding professionals lack clinical knowledge and are unable to perform clinical validations properly. Besides education and/or experience, what makes a successful CDI professional is analytical skills and ability to understand the role of CDI. Some people may not be successful in CDI despite their education and/or experiences due to their inability to grasp the fundamentals of CDI. The questioning of the qualifications of HIM coding professionals has also unintentionally created challenges for those who are trying to obtain roles in clinical validation and/or CDI.
As mentioned above, the skill set and years of clinical education may differ from person to person, but it is important for one to remember that many of us in the beginning of our careers as CDI professionals were trained by a seasoned HIM professional who possessed a wealth of knowledge about coding and clinical indicators they look for in supporting the coding of a diagnosis.
What stirred up this debate about the qualifications of HIM coding professionals was a statement issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) referencing clinical validation in 2013. This same statement was also later reiterated in the American Hospital Association’s (AHA’s) Coding Clinic and the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) publication Clinical Validation: The Next Level of CDI (December 2016 update). Per the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Scope of Work:

    “Clinical validation is an additional process that may be performed along with DRG validation. Clinical validation involves a clinical review of the case to see whether or not the patient truly possesses the conditions that were documented in the medical record. Recovery Auditor clinicians shall review any information necessary to make a prepayment or post-payment claim determination. Clinical validation is performed by a clinician (RN, CMD, or therapist). Clinical validation is beyond the scope of DRG (coding) validation, and the skills of a certified coder. This type of review can only be performed by a clinician or may be performed by a clinician with approved coding credentials.”

Unfortunately, many in the industry took the assertion that “clinical validation is performed by a clinician (RN, CMD or therapist)” out of context. This was referencing RAC processes and who they have identified to perform clinical validation. It is up to every organization to create their own policy and procedure related to clinical validation. In reality, clinical validation is a multi-tiered process, and a piece of it is already being performed by CDI professionals with all different types of backgrounds.

CDI professionals should be reviewing clinical indicators to identify documentation gaps and/or discrepancies requiring clarification. But in the end, clinical validation should be performed in peer-to-peer fashion. As CDI professionals, we are not part of the clinical team, but are the liaisons between the clinical and coding worlds; as a result, we do not perform as a “peer” when issuing clinical validation queries. CDI professionals are trained on the job, regardless of their background, education, and credentials, to understand evidence-based definitions, rules, and regulations related to coding and industry standards so that these can be incorporated into their review process.

Final clinical validation requires provider-to- provider review. Since many providers do not understand the complexity of coding and documentation, it is very important for CDI professionals to become experts in both coding and clinical reviews. It is your knowledge that qualifies you as a clinical validator, not your credentials as a HIM coding professional or your credentials as a clinician.

Comment on this article

 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Anny Pang Yuen, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, CDIP

Anny Pang Yuen is currently the co-chair of the AHIMA CDI Practice Council and a certified coding specialist, clinical documentation specialist, and documentation improvement practitioner. Yuen is also a registered Health Information Advisor and is known as an author to many white papers, articles, and books.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24