New workflow manages DRG mismatches.
Last week on Talk Ten Tuesdays, Lidiya Ter-Markarova, CEO of Innova Revenue Group, discussed a new process that reduces the amount of time it takes coding and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) to reconcile diagnosis-related group (DRG) mismatches. Cutting out the back-and-forth practice of the coder justifying to CDI why their DRG differs has had a positive, advantageous impact on the coders and the coding team as a whole.
Coding is the lifeline of the revenue cycle, and having an efficient DRG reconciliation process in place is crucial for claims to get out the door in a timely fashion. The traditional DRG mismatch reconciliation process that many organizations have in place has not led to the best working relationship between coding and CDI.
The traditional process for the coder involves verifying that the DRG assigned by CDI matches what they assigned at the time of final-coding an account. If the DRGs do not match, the coder will re-review the record and the CDI specialist’s notes to see if there was something that they missed or could have coded differently.
One of the most common reasons for DRG mismatches is CDI assigning a different principal diagnosis than the coder. There are also other DRG mismatch reasons, such as a missed complication or comorbidity (CC) or major CC (MCC), an incorrect procedure code assigned, the wrong discharge disposition being selected, or an incorrect seventh character being added on an ICD-10 code.
Once the reason for the DRG mismatch is found, the coder notifies CDI and includes the reasons why they arrived at a certain DRG. The coder will reference any coding guidelines or official coding references, such as American Hospital Association’s (AHA’s) Coding Clinic, to justify the reason for their final assigned DRG. At times, CDI may not agree with the coder’s reasoning, and this starts the back-and-forth dialogue until a consensus is reached. If a consensus cannot be reached, the usual process is to involve a third party, such as the coding or CDI manager or the physician advisor, to be the tiebreaker. As you can see, this process can be quite cumbersome and time-consuming. The amount of research and emails sent between coding and CDI takes a big chunk out of their productive time.
Since we have implemented the new DRG mismatch workflow, the coder now codes the account, and if a DRG mismatch occurs, the account is routed to a DRG mismatch work queue, wherein the DRG mismatch auditor reviews and determines the correct DRG. The auditor keeps detailed notes of the most common DRG mismatches and provides education to the coders and CDI at their monthly huddle. The education provided to the coding and CDI teams focuses on things like coding guidelines, reviewing clinical criteria, hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) and patient safety indicators (PSIs), and coding difficult procedures as a team.
We even incorporated top DRG denials in these meetings.
The feedback we received from the coders and CDI was nothing but positive. Coders were being exposed to the clinical aspects of coding, and CDI was learning the coding guidelines. This new DRG mismatch workflow has significantly increased coder productivity, coder morale has improved, and the coding and CDI dynamic is more team-oriented, instead of being a coder versus CDI battle.
The tension between coding and CDI has been significantly reduced. This new process has given the coders time to focus on coding, so CDI can focus on making sure the documentation paints a clear clinical picture of the care provided to the patient.
Programming note: Listen to the live reporting by Patty Chua on this subject today on Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10 Eastern.
Having worked in clinical documentation integrity (CDI) in a variety of roles, I have heard a lot of advice when it comes to the timing
Let’s talk about the term “attending physician.” The simplest definition is the physician primarily responsible for a hospitalized patient’s care. While there may be many
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
