LOS versus MSPB—the same or different.
Length of stay (LOS) and Medicare spending per beneficiary (MSPB): are they both necessary? Are they complementary, or different metrics?
In pre-COVID times, revenue in general was good. Yes, there were challenges to be dealt with, but those challenges have worsened in times when gross profit and profit margins have been significantly reduced. In some cases, these metrics have plummeted to the point of tightening budgets, imposing layoffs, and even hospital closures.
Using the analogy of a brook, during certain seasons of the year, waterflow is good, unimpeded. During times of drought, waterflow is reduced, and can be affected by rocks and debris in the riverbed, changes in ground levels, diminution of the water source, and many other factors. Dropping of the water level has made problems more visible, creating greater negative effects. That is what we are seeing now in revenue cycle: revenue flow has dropped and revealed and highlighted the rocks – the problems.
Hospitals and healthcare systems may not have looked so intently at process challenges during the good times, while revenue flow was optimal. Yet, even with that, they did not neglect improvement in processes, with the many aspects of LOS, in an attempt to improve profit margins. So too, Medicare, in order to improve quality of care and preservation of the Medicare Trust Fund, which has been said to have a limited future, has looked at MSPB as a measurement. It is being utilized as a comparison, an incentive, to increase efficiency and reduce the cost of care, while not affecting the quality of delivered care. Both are part of a necessary paradigm shift, but for different reasons.
Cost management has always been important in revenue flow, but even more so today, and both of the aforementioned measures play a role. According to Becker’s Hospital Review, “cost management can be defined as the process of collecting, analyzing, evaluating, and reporting of cost information that is used for budgeting, forecasting, pricing, profitability analysis, and performance reporting.” Revenue cycle management (RCM), when it comes to revenue flow, looks at two different costs:
One may get very prescriptive and state that LOS affects only direct cost, or what happens during the inpatient stay. But in reality, decreasing LOS can have a collateral effect on indirect costs. For example, overhead is a fixed cost, but two days of these fixed costs is a less amount than three days of these fixed costs. Also, in order for LOS to be useful, whatever gets measured must be measured with the same data points, and during the same time of recording that data, in order to reduce variability in the results. Process issues greatly affect LOS, and here are some examples; remember that they will vary from facility to facility:
There are a lot more issues to measure, and dashboards are an absolute necessity.
MSPB looks at more than the inpatient stay. The other two areas included are the three days prior to admission and the 30 days after discharge. MSPB also takes into account more than just the inpatient claim. The indirect costs, the other claims taken into account, include those of the carrier, skilled nursing facility, outpatient center, home health, hospice, and durable medical equipment. They are a combination of direct and indirect costs and are extremely variable, but measureable.
LOS tends to compare the data within one’s own facility, and not as much to national standards and benchmarks, while MSPB compares facilities to all other facilities. It shows the data in dollars and percentage of the national figures.
The goal of analyzing both LOS and MSPB is improvement. I believe that LOS improvement will result in MSPB improvement for the inpatient claim, the inpatient stay. But one must look at what can be done to improve the pre-hospital and post-hospital segments, and that has to do with direct costs. Indirect costs are not so variable. MSPB will not replace LOS.
This is important to understand because it is these areas of the cost of delivering care where LOS and MSPB will have an impact. We as physicians for the longest time have practiced care delivery without acknowledging cost of that delivery, but times are changing. Physicians must be educated to get away from “this is what we’ve always done” thinking. Revenue cycle cannot be clinical, but clinicians can add the perspective of revenue cycle to what we do. Budgets are not unlimited, as reimbursement for services provided are dropping, and if we do not change, the cost of healthcare delivery will become unsustainable.
When looking for areas of process improvement and cost reduction, ask yourself these questions:
I ask again, LOS and MSPB, are they both necessary? Are they complementary, or different metrics? You decide.
In the last seven months, UnitedHealth Group (UHG) has been racked by devastating events, from the massive cyberattack on Change Healthcare in October to the
The educational content and schedule for the upcoming Open Door Forum Webcast series produced by RACmonitor and ICD10monitor have been unveiled. The announcement was made
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
