There are now five types of myocardial infarction (MI) code categories, and the author describes these new options and how they will impact reimbursement.
For cardiology, the focus of ICD-10 is generally on increased specificity and documenting the downstream effects of the patient’s condition. Acute myocardial infarction, or what is more commonly known as AMI, had a definition change when the nation’s healthcare system switched from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM in 2015. So when documenting AMI in ICD-10-CM, here’s a reminder to keep the following in mind before we look at 2018 changes:
ICD-10 Code Examples for AMI:
|
I21.02 |
ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction involving left anterior descending coronary artery |
|
I21.4 |
Non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction |
|
I22.1 |
Subsequent ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction of inferior wall |
Myocardial Infarction (MI) Codes Added for 2018
New codes for myocardial infarction offer physicians and coders more then enough options when considering an MI encounter for a patient. For example, myocardial infarction (MI) type 2 (I21.A1) and other myocardial infarction type (I21.A9) means coders will need to take into consideration the type of MI the patient is experiencing. A type 2 MI describes a myocardial infarction due to demand ischemia. In addition, notes added under ST-elevation MI codes (I21.0-I21.4) clarify that the condition is a type 1 MI. ICD-10-CM further lists additional “types” of MIs, rated 1-5, for clarification of the patient’s status.
When a patient is diagnosed with type 2 myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction due to demand ischemia, or secondary to ischemic balance, you should report new code I21.A1 (myocardial infarction type 2) and include a code for the underlying cause, the guidelines state. Do not assign code I24.8 (other forms of acute ischemic heart disease) for the demand ischemia, in accordance with the instructions.
For diagnoses of myocardial infarction types 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, and 5, the guidelines instruct coders to report code I21.A9 (other myocardial infarction type). In addition, make sure to follow the “code also” and “code first” notes “related to complications, and for coding of post-procedural myocardial infarctions during or following cardiac surgery.”
Will these new classifications of MIs have any effect on reimbursement? We will not be able to fully answer that question until the payers give us feedback in the form of local coverage determinations (LCDs) and policy addendums.
I would recommend that when a Type 4 or 5 MI diagnosis is reported, meaning the patient’s myocardial infarction is related to a therapeutic procedure such as a percutaneous stent or a cardiac surgery, such as a coronary artery bypass graft, the coder and biller monitor their explanation of benefits (EOBs) and insurance company transmittals for any denials or requests for additional information to support the more specific code. Many payers have specific reimbursement guidelines when a scheduled or planned procedure has a causal relationship to an acute diagnosis.
New Codes for Heart Failure
It’s been a long time coming, but ICD-10 finally realized the need to catch up to new technology when it comes to assisting physicians in coding the most specific code for the procedure performed. The new heart failure code sets have new codes for various types of right heart failure, including acute (I50.811), chronic (I50.812), acute on chronic (I50.813), and unspecified (I50.810). You’ll also have new codes to report right heart failure due to left heart failure (I50.814), biventricular heart failure (I50.82), high-output heart failure (I50.83), and end-stage heart failure (I50.84) for patients with an advanced form of the disease who no longer respond to medication.
This was a welcome change when more and more biventricular procedures are being performed, and having a specific diagnosis to link to those services will make more sense to payors then defaulting to unspecified chronic heart failure (CHF).
Program Note: Listen to Terry Fletcher report on this story this morning on Talk-Ten-Tuesdays, at 10 a.m. EST.
This week Blue Cross Blue Shield published an article titled “Study suggests AI is boosting hospital billing.” The study was based on data analyzed by
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) operates a surveillance platform called the Fraud Prevention System (FPS) that analyzes Medicare claims across the full
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
