Case studies are great learning tools for coders, providing an array of detail and rationale to enhance understanding. Here, we explore a case study related to venous access for correct coding. By examining case studies like these, coders can ensure success throughout the year.
Clinical History: Adult patient with end-stage renal disease, difficult venous access, and nonfunctioning right groin AV graft needs intermediate-term central venous access for hemodialysis. The vascular surgeon is planning for a new AV graft in the left thigh. The referring nephrology service has asked for a tunneled dialysis catheter placement in the right groin.
Procedure Performed: Right femoral tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement. The risks, benefits and alternatives to the procedure were explained to the patient, and informed written consent was obtained. The patient was brought to the interventional radiology suite where a time-out procedure was performed. The patient was placed in the supine position. The right groin was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Real-time ultrasound was used, and a permanent image stored. Using ultrasound guidance the right common femoral vein was punctured with a micropuncture needle, after infiltration of the skin and deep tissues with local anesthetic. A 50 cm tip to cuff length, 14.5-Frenchdual lumen Vaxcel hemodialysis catheter was inserted. The catheter was placed through a subcutaneous tunnel requiring a second incision. The incision at the femoral vein access site was closed with 4-0 Vicryl suture. The catheter was secured at the skin exit site with 2-0 Prolene suture. There is free aspiration of blood from all ports of the catheter, which were locked with heparin (concentration 1000 units/cc). A sterile dressing was then applied. Postprocedure chest fluoroscopy showed the tip of the catheter at the right atrium, and an image was stored in the medical record.
The pre-existing left femoral catheter was removed in its entirety. A sterile dressing was applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well with no immediate complications. This procedure was performed using ultrasound and fluoroscopy. Impressions:
There is free aspiration of blood from all ports of the catheter. The catheter is ready for immediate use.
| 36558 | Insertion of tunneled centrally inserted central venous catheter, without subcutaneous port or pump; age 5 years or older |
| +76937 | Ultrasound guidance for vascular access requiring ultrasound evaluation of potential access sites, documentation of selected vessel patency, concurrent real-time ultrasound visualization of vascular needle entry, with permanent recording and reporting (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| +77001 | Fluoroscopic guidance for central venous access device placement, replacement (catheter only or complete), or removal (includes fluoroscopic guidance for vascular access and catheter manipulation, any necessary contrast injections through access site or catheter with related venography radiologic supervision and interpretation, and radiographic documentation of final catheter position) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
Ultrasound was used to locate a suitable vein and to guide the needle access into that vein. An image of the vein was obtained for a permanent record. A catheter was placed from a central vein (femoral vein) into the right atrium of the heart using fluoroscopic guidance including a permanent image of the final position. The catheter was tunneled from a skin entry site away from the vein.
Although the report documents that a previously existing catheter was removed, there is no documentation that it was a tunneled catheter or that dissection was required to remove it. Therefore, no removal code would be assigned.
Explore more regulatory, policy, and coding knowledge to master compliance and coding with our monthly Radiology Compliance Manager.
We all lost an hour of sleep when we “sprang forward” this past weekend. This week is National Sleep Awareness Week for 2026. In its 28th
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
