Today I would like to call your attention to Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI), A21.A1, versus demand ischemia, I24.89. I frequently see denials associated with these two diagnosis codes due to conflicting documentation.
There is an Index entry under “Ischemia, demand, with myocardial infarction,” which is assigned to A21.A1. If the documentation is conflicting, you will need to query the provider regarding the establishment of the myocardial infarction.
The confirmation of the MI changes the code from I24.89 to I21.A1. Another reason to establish Type 2 MI is that demand ischemia is classified as a complication or comorbidity (CC) and Type 2 MI is a major CC (MCC). If you assign a single MCC to a case, then there is an increased likelihood that the case will be reviewed by a payer. This increased scrutiny is another reason to take the time and effort to clarify the presence of the MI.
The Coding Clinic for the fourth quarter of 2023, pgs. 78-79, reviews Chapter 9: Diseases of the Circulatory System updates to the guidelines. Type 2 myocardial infarction due to demand ischemia is assigned A21.A1. If a Type 2 myocardial infarction is described as NSTEMI or STEMI, only assign
A21.A1. Codes A21.01 through A21.4 are only to be assigned to Type 1 acute myocardial infarctions.
Do not confuse demand ischemia with non-ischemic myocardial injury, which is assigned I5A. This diagnosis is a myocardial injury in the absence of ischemia. Physicians utilize high-sensitivity troponin tests to distinguish whether the patient has suffered a non-ischemic myocardial injury versus one of the other myocardial infarction subtypes, according to the Coding Clinic for the fourth quarter of 2021, pgs. 14-15.
A good reference for the acute myocardial infarction subtypes is the Coding Clinic for the fourth quarter of 2017, pgs. 12-14. The acute myocardial infarction codes are found in category I21, with subsequent myocardial infarction codes in category I22.
When in doubt, query! It is much better to establish the diagnosis than to receive a clinical validation denial.
Properly managed identity queues like roster management engines (RMEs) that mitigate errors and potential overlays lay the foundation for a well-maintained master person index (MPI)
The following topics have a place in your facility-specific coding guidelines: Personal History – Does the facility capture personal history codes? These codes may be
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Michelle Wieczorek explores challenges, strategies, and best practices to AI implementation and ongoing monitoring in the middle revenue cycle through real-world use cases. She addresses critical issues such as the validation of AI algorithms, the importance of human validation in machine learning, and the delineation of responsibilities between buyers and vendors.
Frank Cohen shows you how to leverage the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program (CERT) to create your own internal coding and billing risk assessment plan, including granular identification of risk areas and prioritizing audit tasks and functions resulting in decreased claim submission errors, reduced risk of audit-related damages, and a smoother, more efficient reimbursement process from Medicare.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.
Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.
Dive deep into the world of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) coding with our comprehensive webcast. Explore the latest OPPS codes for 2024, understand SDoH assessments, and discover effective strategies for integrating coding seamlessly into healthcare practices. Gain invaluable insights and practical knowledge to navigate the complexities of SDoH coding confidently. Join us to unlock the potential of coding in promoting holistic patient care.
HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDIs on important information in each of the AHA’s 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDISs on important information in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders on information in the AHA’s third quarter 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Copyright © 2024 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy World Health Day! Our exclusive webcast, ‘2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment,’ is just $99 for a limited time! Use code WorldHealth24 at checkout.
