Why You Should Use the New Request for Hearing Form

The advent of revised regulations for administrative law judge (ALJ) hearings of Medicare appeals includes a new request for ALJ hearing or review of dismissal form.

Because the new form — governed by 42 C.F.R. § 405.1014 — provides a logical flow of information for you and the public servants handling your appeal, you should use the form for every new appeal you file. The form, Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals No. OMHA-100, is available online at https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/OMHA-100-Request-for-Hearing-or-Review-of-Dismissal.pdf

Section 1 identifies the part of Medicare under which you are appealing. In Section 2, you are asked to tell OMHA who you are and outline your role in the case. Section 2 also helps OMHA expedite individual beneficiaries’ appeals, which OMHA still expects to decide within 90 days of filing.

Pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 405.1014(a)(1)(i) through –(iii), all appellants must provide a telephone number in Section 3 or 4 of the form. This includes individual beneficiaries.

Representatives must complete Section 4 and attach a CMS-1696 appointment of representative form or other appointment of representative documentation if they answered “no” to the last question in Section 4, asking whether they previously submitted and detailing the appointment of a representative. Privacy rules require an appointment of representative if you want OMHA to talk with you about a case you file for someone else.

In Section 5, you must provide the Medicare appeal or qualified independent contractor (QIC) number assigned to the QIC reconsideration or notice you are appealing (see 42 C.F.R. § 405.1014(a)(1)(iv). Why do you have to provide the QIC number? OMHA needs it to request the case file from the QIC.

42 C.F.R. § 405.1014(a)(1)(v) now requires appellants to specify the dates of service (DOS) of the claims they are appealing. Because beneficiaries may have been hospitalized more than once, in home health, therapy, or hospice for multiple periods, or received more than one shipment of supplies or durable medical equipment (DME), providing dates of service and the QIC number ensures that the ALJ or attorney adjudicator will review and decide the correct claims. 

Healthcare professionals asking for an expedited hearing arising out of a Part D drug denial must explain in Section 6 why waiting the standard 90 days for a decision may jeopardize the beneficiary’s health, life, or ability to regain maximum function. 

In Section 7, explain why you disagree with the denial or dismissal. It’s acceptable to write: “the record supports payment for the services appellant provided the beneficiary on (DOS); please refer to attached letter (or proposed decision).” 

If you are submitting new evidence and are a provider or supplier (or a provider or supplier representing a beneficiary), you must indicate that in Section 8 – and explain why you didn’t previously submit the evidence before the QIC’s reconsideration decision, per 42 C.F.R. § 405.1018(d) and 42 C.F.R. § 405.1028(d). You must submit that “good cause” statement with the request for a hearing, or if you submit the evidence later, with the evidence. You cannot wait until the hearing to submit your good cause statement – the ALJ or attorney adjudicator cannot consider it if you wait. 

In Section 9, you advise if you are aggregating claims to meet the amount in controversy requirement, waiving an oral hearing and requesting an “on-the-record” decision issued without a hearing, or filing a statistical sampling claim. Waiving an oral hearing and requesting an on the record means your case may be assigned to an attorney adjudicator, who is a licensed attorney knowledgeable about Medicare coverage and payment policy, per 42 C.F.R. § 405.902, 42 C.F.R. § 405.1036(b)(2), and 42 C.F.R. § 423.2036(b)(2). 

42 C.F.R. § 405.1014(d)(1) and –(2) – and the new request for hearing form – require you to recite to whom and when you mailed a copy of your request for hearing, including the recipient(s) name, mailing address, city, state, and ZIP code. Your mailing must also include a copy of your position paper, brief, or proposed decision. Providing information about who you served with copies, and when, allows your hearing request to be placed in line for processing.        

Hearing requests that do not include service of copy information will be further delayed while OMHA asks for that information, typically with a notice to correct deficiency. Failure to correct the deficiency in the allowed time will result in dismissal of the request for hearing, per 42 C.F.R. § 405.1014(d)(3), 42 C.F.R. § 405.1052(a)(7), and 42 C.F.R. § 405.1052(b)(4). Dismissal for failing to document providing a copy does not apply to individual beneficiaries. 

Send your request for hearing to the entity specified in the reconsideration decision. If the reconsideration denial or other order directs you to send it to OMHA, Section 11 provides addresses and mail stops.

Using the new form ensures that you provide all the information you need to perfect your appeal. Using the form helps the intake clerks in centralized docketing and eventual ALJ legal assistants quickly input your appeal information. Help yourself, and help OMHA help you. Use the form. 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Bob Soltis

Bob Soltis is a success coach and the author of How to Handle Your Medicare Hearing. A former U.S. Navy officer, he decided 4,500 cases during eight years as an ALJ at OMHA.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24