Why it’s Time to Retire the Term Non-compliant

Why it’s Time to Retire the Term Non-compliant

Non-compliance in healthcare typically means a patient who intentionally refuses to take prescribed medication or does not follow treatment recommendations.  This term is often used in medical documentation as physicians and/or care team professionals categorizing patients in the ‘not doing what I say’ category.  The effects of this term project’s a picture of intentional negligence by the patient, placing blame on their choices.  Non-compliance was once a more popular term used in the medical community to remove perceived risk from the provider, however, recent research has created a different picture.  According to research from Sous, W., Frank, K., Cronkright, P. et al. (2022), the term ‘non-compliant’ has been shown to compromise care, particularly for marginalized communities.  Ethically, this term has failed to demonstrate a provider’s respect for patient autonomy and has created a reverse effect of the ‘do no harm’ mantra.

So, let’s give a hypothetical example, Mr. Jones has been placed under observation services at the local hospital for evaluation of his chest pain.  Mr. Jones lives alone about 20 miles from the hospital where he is seeking care.  While working outside, he started having shortness of breath and chest pain leading him to call 911.  At the hospital, the care team starts running numerous tests on Mr. Jones, but all he can think about is his land and his animals back home.  Mr. Jones is concerned about his heart but was just hoping for some medication and to be back on his way.  He really doesn’t like doctors’ offices, much less hospitals and has spent many years avoiding them.  When the physicians come in the room, they tell him what they are doing using hard to understand medical terminology.  The nursing staff have been giving him medications and hooking him up to machines again with confusing medical terms.  Mr. Jones has now been at the hospital overnight and although he is feeling better, he does not see the need to stay.  He has his animals at home that need to be fed and he wants to take care of his property.  Mr. Jones requests to leave.  At this point all efforts kick in from the hospital as they term Mr. Jones as wanting to leave against medical advance, AKA, the AMA discharge and document his behaviors as non-compliant in the medical record.  Rather than diving into the misconception of the AMA discharge and Mr. Jones concerns.   I will say that Mr. Jones agrees to help with his discharge and get the information he needs for follow-up care and the care team even helps coordinate a ride home.  However, the labeling in his record stands, he is a ‘non-compliant patient with an AMA discharge’. 

The scenario creates the picture that our lives are filled with competing priorities and stressors.  With the best of intentions, the non-compliant patient does not take their medication because they do not have the money to do so.  The non-compliant patient misses their doctor’s appointment because they have no transportation or maybe the city bus was late. As a healthcare community, rather than labeling our patients based on our own perspective of privilege we should use the situation to ignite a call to action that we may have overlooked a valuable piece in our patient’s healthcare needs. What if instead of just assuming the patient is simply not following medical advice or making their medical care a priority, we consider the following.

  • Break down the process into more manageable steps and apply such methods as teach-back to assess the patients’ understanding of their healthcare requirements.
  • Evaluate the patient’s motivation towards their care and potential barriers they may be dealing with.
  • Assess for social determinants and cultural considerations that may make the information provided or their treatment requirements difficult to follow or comply with.
  • Encourage patient input and feedback to generate their own ideas and suggestions into their care needs.

I would imagine in our lives at one point or another we all could be labeled as non-compliant and in the busy schedule and demands on our healthcare system sometimes it is easier to write ‘non-compliant’ then figure out the reasons why. However, this impacts access to care and healthcare outcomes for our patients.

References:
Sous, W., Frank, K., Cronkright, P. et al. Use of a simulated patient case and structured debrief to explore trainee responses to a “non-compliant patient”. BMC Med Educ 22, 842 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03894-7

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM

Tiffany Ferguson is CEO of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., the care management company. Tiffany serves on the ACPA Observation Subcommittee. Tiffany is a contributor to RACmonitor, Case Management Monthly, and commentator for Finally Friday. After practicing as a hospital social worker, she went on to serve as Director of Case Management and quickly assumed responsibilities in system level leadership roles for Health and Care Management and c-level responsibility for a large employed medical group. Tiffany received her MSW at UCLA. She is a licensed social worker, ACM, and CMAC certified.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24