Comfort care is not an indication to stop documenting and coding.
Last week, a listener reached out to me to ask me my opinion on querying for potential comorbid conditions or complications in relation to patients who expire. Specifically, she pinpointed patients who were transitioned to comfort care and asked whether it was fishing for CC/MCCs to query for end-of-life diagnoses, especially in the context of withholding active treatment.
When I was a physician advisor, I spent a large chunk of my weekly time in mortality reviews and giving providers feedback on documentation opportunities. My philosophy was that the coding abstract should be able to be reconstituted into a story if you translate the codes back into conditions. A provider’s job is to truthfully tell the story of the encounter, and the coder’s job is to accurately convert the verbiage into ICD-10 codes. I found it exceedingly annoying when I got to the end of an encounter and was left wondering, “Why did this patient die?!”
Comfort care encompasses both hospice and palliative care. Hospice is a specific subsegment of comfort care without curative intent, usually in patients with a limited (e.g., < 6 months) life expectancy. Palliative care can be provided at any time in the course of a serious, usually chronic, illness, and there may or may not be curative intent of treatment. Mortality reviews usually only exclude patients who are formal hospice patients. There may be further guidelines, such as the patient must be covered by hospice insurance and be in for symptom control only. This may vary between mortality models, but I am only intimately familiar with the one my organization utilized.
During my research for this segment, I discovered that the preferred term is “intensive comfort measures,” and this resonates with me. That term feels more active, as though you are choosing a positive treatment, rather than withholding or declining treatments in the negative. There are many symptoms which are addressed with intensive comfort measures, including pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, constipation, cough, and dry mouth.
The discussion and decision to defer, withhold, or decline medical treatment is a very labor-intensive activity. It used to take me much longer to educate a patient as to why they did not need an antibiotic for their viral upper respiratory infection than it would to just scribble out a prescription. If a coder or CDIS is assessing whether something is a legitimate secondary diagnosis, the fact that treatment is not ultimately being undertaken should not prevent them from capturing the condition. In the Evaluation & Management universe, a decision not to resuscitate or to deescalate care because of poor prognosis is a criterion for high risk of morbidity from additional diagnostic testing or treatment, justifying the highest level of service in an office or ambulatory services setting.
If a patient expires, the diagnosis of the terminal cardiac arrest is implicit in the disposition. If a patient were to sustain a cardiac arrest, were to be resuscitated and linger for a week before finally succumbing, that cardiac arrest would be captured. Even though cardiac arrest (also ventricular fibrillation, respiratory arrest, certain types of shock) is only an MCC if the patient is discharged alive, its capture helps tells the story in codes.
If a patient transitions through stages of active dying proximate to expiration, I would not recommend capturing those (e.g., suffering an acute respiratory arrest leading to death within minutes in a patient who is Do-Not-Intubate, Do-Not-Resuscitate). That is inherent to the act of dying. However, if a patient lapses into a coma and survives for three days prior to expiring, that is a condition which should be recorded and captured.
There are a few reasons which I think support querying for significant conditions.
As always, the provider should be given enough information and clinical indicators to make a good decision as to whether a condition was present or not. The query should be compliant and non-leading. The fact that the mortality metrics will be affected should not be offered.
In conclusion, my opinion is that being deemed comfort care is not an indication to stop documenting and coding. After all, DNR does not stand for “Do Not Record.”
Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer when she co-hosts Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck, Tuesdays at 10 Eastern.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used artificial intelligence- (AI)-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ongoing discussion about U.S. disengagement from the World Health Organization (WHO), with withdrawal effective Jan. 22, has refocused attention on how global standards
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
