“Quality rankings” are often oxymoronic.
My local paper recently had a headline asking “Does your clinic measure up? Check Minnesota’s quality rankings.” The paper proceeded to report on data from an organization that “tracks healthcare quality and costs statewide,” offering rankings of clinics.
The report specifically cited two clinics that “kept 57 percent of adult patients with diabetes at optimal health.” Then came the key sentence: “patients meet this criterion if they have low blood sugar and blood pressure levels, refrain from smoking, and take aspirin and cholesterol-lowering drugs.”
The article continued by shaming two additional clinics that “only achieved a 20-percent success rate by comparison.”
Consider these ne’er-do-well clinics, where four out of five patients either failed to maintain low blood pressure or blood sugar levels, smoked, or failed to take aspirin and cholesterol-lowering drugs. Is the fact that a patient smokes the responsibility of their clinic? What about their failure to take aspirin? Their sweet tooth that results in a high blood sugar?
The notion that a clinic is responsible for activities of its patients is truly bizarre to me. It is reasonable to hold a clinic responsible for educating patients about the benefits of stopping smoking. But I am not familiar with a way in which a clinic can compel a patient to stop smoking.
In fact, the only way I know that a clinic can guarantee that none of its patients smoke would be to have no patients. Ranking clinics based on patient behavior is completely silly.
To be fair to the publishers of this study, the executive describing it did say that the measurement data isn’t intended as a way to compare clinics, because each has unique patient populations and challenges. He asserts that the goal is to give clinics data so they can identify weaknesses and find solutions in their practices.
That’s all well and good. But that is not how the data was being presented. We frequently have segments discussing the social determinants of health (SDoH).
It doesn’t require very much expertise to recognize that patients who face significant social challenges will have a lower likelihood of complying with all medical recommendations.
Ranking clinics based on patient compliance has to be among the most useless exercises possible, and likely harmful. If an organization actually worries about its rankings, it has a strong incentive to jettison non-compliant patients.
Rather than trying to bring patients into compliance, it is easier to send them away. A ranking that can be gamed by denying individuals healthcare isn’t a metric that’s likely to prove useful to anyone.
Many years ago, I talked about a quality ranking metric that was “keeping patients safe.” That metric didn’t focus on domestic violence or access to guns; it measured the percentage of safe and effective generic medications the clinic was using. It was a cost metric, misleadingly labelled as a quality one.
When it comes to quality metrics, it is best to assume that the metric itself may lack quality.
A current movement within the clinical revenue cycle is putting utilization review and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) under the same reporting structure. There are many
Last week MedLearn Media published an article by Bryan Nordley titled “Defend Against IR Dialysis Circuit Denials: Expert Coding Tips to Promote Success in 2026.”
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
