Are all myocardial infarctions (MIs) created equal? Let’s take a look at demand ischemia, non-ischemic myocardial injury, and type 2 myocardial infarctions.
According to ACDIS, demand ischemia is a specific type of ischemia wherein oxygen requirements of the myocardium are not being met due to some increased need. The code for demand ischemia is I24.8.
According to the Coding Clinic for the Fourth Quarter of 2021, pgs. 14-15, non-ischemic myocardial injury is characterized by the rise and/or fall of cardiac troponin levels, with at least one value above the 99th-percentile upper limit. The case presented is a patient who becomes increasingly somnolent.
The diagnostic workup reveals elevated troponin level and intermittent atrial fibrillation. The patient did not have chest pain or EKG changes, and troponin levels stabilized. The provider documented non-ischemic myocardial injury. The question associated with the case was how the diagnosis was coded. The response was I5A.
The Coding Clinic for the Fourth Quarter of 2017, pgs. 12-14, lists the types of myocardial infarction. There are various types that range from type 1 through type 5. Type 2 myocardial infarction is a myocardial infarction secondary to ischemic imbalance, as in coronary vasospasm, anemia, or hypotension.
There is a question in this issue of Coding Clinic regarding how to code a type 2 NSTEMI due to demand ischemia. The answer is I21.A1 – myocardial infarction, type 2. Do not assign I24.8. According to the ICD-10-CM guidelines, codes I21.01-I21.4 should only be assigned to type 1 acute myocardial infarctions.
The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction provides detailed definitions of various types of MIs. This document was published by the Journal of American College of Cardiology, on Nov. 13, 2018. It is important that the cardiologists are clear regarding the type of myocardial infarction or injury that is being treated.
When I am auditing, I frequently see I21.A1 assigned for demand ischemia, but there is no documentation of a myocardial infarction. If the documentation is unclear, a query should be written to determine if the patient has a type 1 myocardial infarction, a type 2 myocardial infarction with demand ischemia, a non-ischemic myocardial injury, or just plain-old demand ischemia.
Even if a query is written, the diagnosis must be supported by clinical information. If the documentation states “myocardial infarction,” then there should be support found in the electrocardiograms and cardiac enzymes. This query could avoid denials that occur after the payor processes the claim and reviews medical records.
While the query may slow down reimbursement, it will ensure that you are paid correctly for the patient’s presentation.
Programming note: Listen to live coding reports by Laurie Johnson every Tuesday on Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck and Dr. Erica Remer.
This week I would like to address myths about multiple-choice physician queries that persist, despite guidance from the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and
I am so grateful to have the opportunity to use this platform and my Talk Ten Tuesdays segment, “My Talk,” to shine a spotlight on
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Copyright © 2025 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
