As the November elections neared, you might have expected Washington to slow to a crawl amidst campaigning and uncertainty about the future. However, the show must go on, and both the Biden Administration and Congress have had an extremely busy month.
While most associate the month of October with Indigenous Peoples’ Day and Halloween, it is also Cybersecurity Awareness Month. Officially launched in 2004 by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the nonprofit National Cybersecurity Alliance, the observance has only grown in importance, as cybersecurity incidents have skyrocketed in number; indeed, 2024 will likely be remembered as a year with some of the most impactful cybersecurity incidents in history.
In light of this, President Biden recently listed off some of his Administration’s achievements in the field, such as the National Cybersecurity Strategy released in 2023. In addition to this, federal legislation was recently introduced to regulate cybersecurity specifically in healthcare. Authored by two Democratic senators, the “Health Infrastructure Security and Accountability Act” would see the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) develop minimum cybersecurity standards for plans, providers, clearinghouses, and associated businesses. The bill would allocate monies to assist hospitals in adopting essential cybersecurity standards, and to follow enhanced cybersecurity measures, including annual audits, stress tests, and the creation of recovery plans. It has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee.
While that bill is currently not bipartisan, members of Congress from both sides of the aisle are in alignment on another important issue: telehealth.
Frequent readers have surely noticed me report on the COVID-era flexibilities on telehealth at the federal level, and the arguments over whether they should be extended. With many set to expire on Dec. 31 of this year, members of the Senate and House both sent letters to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) objecting to a proposal that allegedly seeks to limit the prescription of both controlled and non-controlled substances via telemedicine.
The specifics of the proposal were reported by Politico Pro, which attributed them to an unnamed DEA official. After much public outcry – and reportedly, criticism from HHS – the DEA submitted another proposed rule on the issue earlier this month. The DEA’s proposed rule is not yet available to the public, but is titled “Third Temporary Extension of COVID-19 Telemedicine Flexibilities,” and sources have reported that the extension is for another year. This means that the ultimate decision will likely be under a new administration.
Turning to COVID-era flexibilities that were not extended, the Centers for Medicare & Medcaid Services (CMS) released the latest Medicare Advantage star ratings – and the results have already sparked a lawsuit. The agency had relaxed its star rating calculation standards as part of pandemic relief efforts, which naturally resulted in higher numbers of insurers being awarded top scores, and the bonus payments that go along with them. However, post-pandemic CMS raised the bar back up, and then some. In 2022, a total of 74 plans earned five out of five stars, but this time, just seven did. And the percentage of plans earning four stars or more shrunk by 4 percent in just one year.
At an industry conference last week, CMS was clear that the election was not slowing the agency down. CMS Principal Deputy Administrator and COO Jon Blum spoke abouthis agency’s “huge agenda,” and noted that it was “very bipartisan and will continue no matter who is sitting in the (Oval) Office during 2025.”
So, while the nation is focused on the election, the Biden Administration and Congress appear intent on moving forward on healthcare priorities.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used artificial intelligence- (AI)-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the
As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) clarifies existing Medicare policies like the Two-Midnight Rule, which guides the appropriateness of inpatient services, some
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
