What should you do if you get an email with the subject line “U.S. Office of Inspector General HHS – Special Investigations?” A doctor I’m working with in the northern part of the country received such an email. Fortunately, he handled it well, but there are still lessons to be learned. The email began with:
“The United States Office of Inspector General – HHS is charged with investigating complaints relating to healthcare matters. The Special Investigations branch is tasked with investigating complaints of employee and contractor wrongdoing and whistleblower-reprisal complaints. We are in receipt of a complaint that involved a current or former employer of yours.
You’ve been listed as a possible witness to reported allegations, and we’d like to schedule a time to virtually discuss the matter…”
If you’re the lucky recipient of something similar, what should you do?
First, I want to emphasize that it is improper for anyone, including me, to prevent you from talking to a government agent. You always have the right to talk to a government agent, and with the exception of disclosing personal health information (PHI), there aren’t many restrictions on what you can say.
But unless we’re talking about a licensing board, or if you’ve been issued a subpoena, you also have the right to decline to speak with an agent. While I cannot forbid you from reaching out to the government agent, my strong recommendation would be for you to forward the email to your organization’s legal counsel.
If you’re not doing that right out of the chute, there is something imperative for you to do: verify the authenticity of the communication. This particular email listed the agent’s name and a mobile and office number, as well as a general duty phone.
It didn’t include a physical address, so it was difficult to determine where the agent was located, although the area code was from the southeastern part of the country, which struck me as odd, given that the entity apparently under investigation was in the upper midwest, eight states away.
So, how do you verify the legitimacy of the agent?
One option you should immediately reject: calling the number listed in the email. It may be tempting to call the duty number and ask if the agent is genuine. But if someone is pretending to be a government agent, it is pretty easy to create a fake signature block, and that fake signature block is going to include fake phone numbers.
I’ve written about “Vandelay Industries” before, and I am sure I will be doing so again (in Seinfeld, George routinely used a fake entity, Vandelay Industries, as a phony reference. George gave out Jerry’s number, asserting it was Vandelay Industries, asking Jerry to masquerade as a former employer, answering his home phone “Vandelay Industries,” in attempts to con prospective employers.) There are many shakedown schemes that involve people pretending to be a government agent.
In this instance, there was one reason to believe that the email was genuine, despite the atypical geography. The email originated the domain @oig.hhs.gov. I want to emphasize that I don’t simply mean that that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) address appeared in the body of a text as a hyperlink. It’s possible to set up hyperlinks to send emails to an address that differs from the words that appear in the email itself. But it’s much more difficult to hijack an actual domain.
If I type an email address with my own hands that includes a domain that I know to be a true government domain, I can be pretty confident that the email will go to an actual government employee – or, at worst, a non-existent email address. In this case, I think that is the easiest way to verify the agent’s authenticity.
Locating a phone number for an OIG agent can be extremely difficult. But if you know their name, you can send an email to @oig.hhs.gov.
That’s what I did here, and the agent proved to be legitimate.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
Here at MedLearn, we know cardiology coders are the unsung heroes of patient care. Every day, as a cardio coder you navigate complex cardiovascular procedures, including the constantly –changing CPT® and ICD-10-CM
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
