As with most things, for vascular IR coding it’s important to diligently maintain foundational knowledge while continuing to build – because, if there’s one thing we can be sure of with IR coding it’s that, at some point, it’s going to change. A stable foundation allows us to absorb those changes with a little more ease and confidence.
The start of a new year is the best time to re-set and refresh foundational knowledge with a review of vascular IR coding fundamentals. Over the years, the trend with codes has been a move back to “bundled codes” – meaning a single code to describe the entire procedure. While most interventional, and many diagnostic, services are now defined by bundled codes, there are still services that are reported with component coding.
Component Coding Rules
You must know where you started and where you ended up to correctly code for selective catheter placements.
Documentation must be clear on these points to ensure correct code assignment. For example, a statement such as “via the right groin approach” clearly defines the vascular access point.
When allowed, code each vascular family separately.
A vascular family is defined as a vessel that branches off the aorta or vena cava along with all secondary (and additional) vessels that branch from that vessel. So, this means that if the catheter is placed in the right and left subclavian arteries for imaging of the upper extremities, each would be separately coded. Assuming normal vascular anatomy, see code 36215 for the left subclavian and 36216 for the right subclavian.
When allowed, code to the highest degree of selectivity within a vascular family.
Review the RVUs for each of the codes. The lesser orders of selectivity are valued lower than the higher orders of selectivity. Simply stated, you cannot code for what you “pass through” to get to the more distal portion of the vessel.
When allowed, selective codes take precedence over non-selective codes if done from the same puncture site.
Again, a review of RVUs will show that non-selective codes (arterial: 36100, 36140, 36160 and 36200) carry lower values than selective options either above (36215–36218) or below the diaphragm (36245–36248). Similarly, venous non-selective options (36000, 36005 and 36010) carry lower RVUs than selective venous choices (36011 and 36012). Bundled or collapsed CPT options for dialysis fistula/graft imaging (36901–36909), arch, carotid and vertebral angiography (36221–36228) and unilateral and bilateral selective renal angiography (36251– 36254) are exceptions as these codes include valuation for both the S&I and surgical component of procedures.
When allowed, code each catheter placement from each separate puncture site individually (i.e., multiple punctures for placement of aortic endograft).
When more than one access site is used to gain entry into the vascular system, regardless of whether the catheter/device ends up in the same location, when allowed, each may be separately coded. To illustrate, if lower extremity venography is performed via separate needle placements in the right and left foot, each placement and injection should be separately coded. A single S&I code would be used to define imaging.
Code to the intent of the study.
If attempting to place a catheter into the abdominal aorta and the catheter inadvertently goes into the renal artery, while the renal artery is by definition a “selective” placement, it should not be coded as such as this was not the initial intent.
When allowed, if both diagnostic and therapeutic studies are performed in the same session, be certain to code separately for each portion.
The key here is to clearly understand the definition of any and all CPT codes being assigned or those being contemplated for assignment. The trend is that new codes that have been bundled/collapsed will include all parts of the study. Some allow separate coding of imaging with the intervention when performed in a full and complete fashion (see 37220–37235 or 37211–37214) and others include both imaging and intervention (i.e., TIPS procedures, cervical carotid stent placement, intracranial angioplasty with or without stent, etc.). You must review current CPT language to determine what is allowed or considered to be bundled/packaged into the intervention.
Do not code for the forming of catheters.
While not routinely done, this may occur when performing visceral or pelvic angiography. The catheter/device is “shaped” inside the patient in a vessel and then advanced into another vessel. The term “Waltman’s loop” indicates this shaping or forming.
Only one second or third order vessel within a vascular family can be described by a second or third order code. See codes 36218 or 36248 for arterial studies, 36012 for venous studies, or 36015 for pulmonary angiography.
As stated previously, you will always code to the highest degree of selectivity reached in each family. You also may not code for a vessel that you must pass through to reach this higher degree of selectivity. Arterially, code 36218 or 36248 is not used when more than one second- or third-order vessel is studied in separate vascular families. In this instance, each separate family is coded individually to the highest degree of selectivity reached in each.
Simple, right? Absolutely not, and that’s why it’s important to diligently maintain foundational knowledge while continuing to build – because, if there’s one thing we can be sure of with IR coding it’s that, at some point, it’s going to change. A stable foundation allows us to absorb those changes with a little more ease and confidence.
Master the Fundamentals of IR Coding
Join us for the first installment of our 11-part interventional radiology coding series, now available on-demand, featuring prominent interventional radiology coding expert Jeff Majchrzak, BA, RCC, CIRCC.
This session provides a foundation for interventional radiology coding with an opportunity to reset and get grounded in a broad range of coding basics – covering terminology, vascular anatomy, modifiers, CCI fundamentals, and bundled and component coding rules for diagnostic and therapeutic IR services.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Now’s the time for to us to schedule those mammograms and colonoscopies we may have been putting off, but it is also a good time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
