Unemployment, COVID-19, and Testing Claims

America’s new normal. 

Unemployed, uninsured, unbelievable! The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that 12.6 million Americans are on unemployment rosters around the country; 32.5 percent of the adult population has been jobless for over five months. Of those who are jobless, many remain uninsured. What happens when these individuals are infected with COVID? The answer is simple: the federal government is supposed to cover testing and treatment.

States with the highest uninsured rates are receiving the majority of dollars. How much are we talking about? How does $1.5 billion sound? That’s a pretty penny, though lower than many experts anticipated. QuoteWizard by Lending Tree evaluated data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on claims reimbursement to providers over the course of the pandemic. The study looked at the total funds provided to each state through uninsured claims for testing and treatment. That figure was then divided by the total number of COVID-19 cases for the state, as well as those who are uninsured. Keep in mind that on top of 12.6 million unemployed in the U.S., there are well over ten million cases of the virus, with over 50,000 hospitalizations at present.

States with the highest numbers of uninsured people were among those that received the most funding in COVID-19 reimbursement – in other words, the highest costs per case were associated with states with the highest levels of uninsured individuals. Ten of these states were non-Medicaid expansion states (specifically Texas, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Kansas, Mississippi, Alabama, and South Dakota). New Jersey sat atop the list, followed by North Carolina, Texas, and Tennessee. While the average cost per case was $142, the rate variation between New Jersey and Tennessee was fascinating:

  • New Jersey had 222,193 cases, with over $46 million for testing claims, while close to $84 million was allocated for treatment claims reimbursement at $586 per case.
  • Tennessee had over 233,000 cases, with roughly $19 million in testing claims and almost $23 million in treatment claims. The cost per case there was $180.
  • For a point of reference, Montana was ranked last: 24,093 cases, $96,000 in testing claims, and $103,000 in treatment claims. The cost per case was…wait for it…$8.

The URL for the list of all states appears on the QuoteWizard site.

I’m unsure what’s more intriguing about these numbers: the variations in treatment and costs per case, or considering how much higher these costs will get? Economic relief packages passed by Congress allocated $176 billion towards reimbursement for hospitals and healthcare facilities.

With the latest COVID wave hitting states with the highest numbers of persons impacted most by the social determinants of health (SDoH), this week’s Monitor Mondays Listeners Survey asked whether there will be sufficient reimbursement by the federal government to pay all submitted claims. The answers may surprise you, and can be viewed here.

Programming Note: Ellen Fink-Samnick is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays. Listen to her live reporting every Monday at 10 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Ellen Fink-Samnick, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, CCM, CRP

Ellen Fink-Samnick is an award-winning healthcare industry expert. She is the esteemed author of books, articles, white papers, and knowledge products. A subject matter expert on the Social Determinants of Health, her latest books, The Essential Guide to Interprofessional Ethics for Healthcare Case Management and Social Determinants of Health: Case Management’s Next Frontier (with foreword by Dr. Ronald Hirsch), are published through HCPro. She is a panelist on Monitor Mondays, frequent contributor to Talk Ten Tuesdays, and member of the RACmonitor Editorial Board.

Related Stories

Help: What Do I Do Now?

Help: What Do I Do Now?

The PHE has ended and the three-day SNF rule has returned. Following up on my previous article posted in April regarding the return of the

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

Mastering Good Faith Estimates Under the No Surprises Act: Compliance and Best Practices

The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

Mastering E&M Guidelines: Empowering Providers for Accurate Service Documentation and Scenario Understanding in 2023

This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.

June 21, 2023
Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Breaking Down the Proposed IPPS Rule for FY 2024: Top Impacts You Need to Know

Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.

May 24, 2023

Trending News