Delays in transitions to post-acute care are a vexing issue.
I am continuing to see a significant number of healthcare organizations dealing with denials and delays related to transitions to post-acute care. As such, I thought it would make a good topic for today’s article.
Delays related to transfers to post-acute facilities such as long-term acute care (LTAC), rehabilitation centers, or skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are common across the country, and there are a couple of factors at play:
In review of one of our client’s avoidable days, we are seeing these issues delay patients’ transfers to the tune of anywhere from 2-7 days, as they await placement in a post-acute facility and deal with their insurance company.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals were encouraged to send patients to other levels of care. The Public Health Emergency (PHE) waivers allowed hospitals to quickly move patients to post-acute facilities without prior authorization or the three-day inpatient stay requirement, in order to increase bed capacity. The trend was and unfortunately still is the mindset that “they no longer need to be here, so let’s free up a bed and move them to LTAC, rehab, or SNF.”
The payers do not practice this way; they are not concerned with your bed capacity issues. Since 2022, many payers started following post-acute InterQual criteria to authorize transfers to post-acute care, and any patients who did not meet the criteria were denied or required a peer-to-peer encounter. What payers are looking for specifically is, “why can’t the patient go home?” Then they will consider the next level up, or ask “why can’t this person have home health?” Then they will consider the next level. Reviewing physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT) documentation, their notes will make an optimal suggestion, but fail to consider why this could not have been in a lower care setting. For instance, yes, it would be great if every patient went to rehab, but that is expensive, and not always needed.
This is where case management comes in! A solid case management team should be able to work with PT/OT personnel, the physician, and care team, then make collective recommendations based on the assessment of the patient’s situation and the insurance factors proactively. However, case management has struggled as well over the last few years with turnover, short staffing, outdated models of practice, and lack of training (or, most likely, all the above). Many case managers are likely just facilitating the recommendations as they receive them and are unsure of what they can push back on. When this happens, the limited post-acute beds are being filled with patients who could have gone home, causing the hospital to hold patients longer because those patients who need the bed are stuck in the hospital waiting for transfer.
Yes, there is technology for efficiencies and guidance, but this is also indicative of a change of practice that is needed to unravel some of what was our best method – and became habit during the pandemic years.
Is your hospital or health system dealing with patients being denied transfers to post-acute facilities?
Today I’m going to continue my exploration of what I learned at the annual Association of Clinical Documentation Specialists (ACDIS) Conference last month in Chicago.
In my recent hospital travels, involving working with frontline case management staff, we completed an initial assessment and intervened with a patient who provides one
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Practical solutions for CDM departments to protect your hospital’s revenue.
This webcast teaches hospitals how to comply with CMS price transparency rules and compare their rates with peer hospitals. It covers creating a compliant machine-readable file, comparing negotiated rates, and improving pricing decisions.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.
This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.
Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.
Do you struggle with selecting and appending the correct modifier for your medical claims? Join our must-attend webinar, “Mastering Modifier Usage: Preventing Denials and Ensuring Compliance” to reduce claim denials and improve your reimbursement rates.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDISs on important information in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2023 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Copyright © 2023 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
