Therapy Providers Score High on TPE Audits

Initial round of audits proves successful for therapy providers.

Therapy providers in the Novitas JL jurisdiction have received good news on the initial round of targeted probe-and-educate (TPE) audits. 

A total of 93 percent of the 102 therapy reviews received a “minor classification.” Of note, a minor classification can include a 0 percent error rate (seems odd that a provider that passes at 100 percent is categorized in the “minor” category). 

A breakdown of the 102 reviews is as follows:

  • 95 Total Reviews with Minor Classification (93 percent)
  • 3 Total Reviews with Moderate Classification (3 percent)
  • 3 Total Reviews with Major Classification (3 percent)
  • 1 Total Review with Insufficient Sample (1 percent)

According to Novitas, the most common reasons for denial (or partial denial) were medical necessity and insufficient documentation. Of course, this is what all the contractors and Medicare reviewers say about therapy documentation! But what does it really mean? 

Medical Necessity

There are a whole host of reasons that a service may be deemed not medically necessary, but Novitas cites primarily the lack of a certified plan of care (POC) that contains all the necessary elements and is properly certified and recertified. The information provided in the Novitas report on the first round of audits was taken verbatim from the Medicare Benefits Policy Manual, Chapter 15, Sections 220-230. 

Insufficient Documentation

Providers that did not submit documentation in response to an ADR (additional documentation requests) in a timely manner were tagged with this error. Novitas stated that they made repeated attempts to contact providers prior to marking this as an error. The education component in the report also stated that insufficient documentation may also relate to the documentation in the therapy record matching the date of service submitted on the claim.

Overall, this is a good report, and it reflects well on the therapy industry. The report did not indicate how many providers are moving to the second round of TPE audits, but it would appear that based upon the percentages noted, not many will receive that second invitation. 

The Novitas JL jurisdiction includes the District of Columbia, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The results of the Novitas JH jurisdiction (Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Colorado) have not been posted.

Stay tuned to Monitor Mondays for TPE updates across the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). 

Program Note:

Listen to Nancy Beckley on Monitor Mondays every Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. Eastern.

 

Comment on this article

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Nancy J. Beckley, MB, MBA, CHC

Nancy Beckley is founder and president of Nancy Beckley & Associates LLC, providing compliance planning and outsourced compliance services to rehab providers in hospitals, rehab agencies, and private practices. Nancy is certified in healthcare compliance by the Healthcare Compliance Certification Board. She is on the board of the National Association of Rehabilitation Providers and Agencies. She previously served on the CMS Professional Expert Technical Panel for Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. Nancy is a familiar voice on Monitor Mondays, where she serves as a senior national correspondent.

Related Stories

AI in Healthcare Documentation: Who’s Training Whom?

AI in Healthcare Documentation: Who’s Training Whom?

EDITOR’S NOTE: AI-assisted editing tools were used only for proofreading and language refinement; all analysis, interpretation, and conclusions reflect the author’s original work. Artificial intelligence

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24