The patient lending platform (PLP) model is increasingly being seen as a source of fiscal aid in a time of razor-thin profit margins.
“First do no harm” is a tenet often heard in healthcare. In today’s environment, the same promise should certainly be extended to the payment arena: do no harm to the patient’s pocketbook.
In a recent Modern Healthcare article, it was stated that CEOs are struggling with the status quo. This could be considered true across the healthcare continuum. It is a constant challenge to maintain a healthy cash flow in the industry. The challenge has only escalated in light of COVID. Typically, healthcare providers work on extremely small profit margins. These challenges have become even greater for rural health providers, as well as critical access providers.
Stepping outside of the status quo and exploring opportunities to provide innovative and efficient care without having to expend countless hours on payment collections might sound like a tale from an alternate universe. However, it can become reality when a patient lending platform (PLP) is introduced to streamline the process of payment and collections. A PLP is a relatively new concept that has offered relief in the healthcare environment, particularly in rural areas and/or small communities.
PLPs partner with healthcare providers and community banks to reduce the financial burden on patients while quickly offering cash solutions to providers. The transactions allow providers to receive immediate payment, while patients are allowed to pay back the bank in time-based installments at low interest rates. Patients are essentially in control of the loan terms, which allow affordable repayment of healthcare costs. PLPs allow patient-provider financial transactions to run “in the background,” thereby promoting efficiency and tremendous cost savings as the burdensome collection work typically done by staff is offloaded to a local bank partner.
For banks, this can provide a unique lending opportunity: an additional interest revenue stream with a low customer acquisition cost. When it comes to patient collections, revenue cycle management (RCM) companies are an integral part of the overall process. If a claim is not fully adjudicated, RCM works with the insurance company to remediate issues, as appropriate. It is not uncommon for a well-versed professional in the RCM space to support a patient’s understanding of their bill and/or Explanation of Benefits (EOB). Even after a claim has been fully adjudicated, RCM can lend its expertise to ensure that it is adjudicated correctly. An inaccurate bill is certainly not considered an infrequently encountered event.
In February 2020, CNBC reported that 32 percent of American workers have healthcare debt, and 28 percent owe more than $10,000. On average, 55 percent of uncollected healthcare revenue is a patient’s responsibility. Almost half of those surveyed defaulted on their medical bills. As health insurance deductibles and co-insurance rates continue to increase, so does the financial and administrative burden to hospitals.
Within healthcare, we have broadened our horizons, moving toward artificial intelligence, natural language processing, computer-assisted coding, and other technological advances. Claim adjudication is routine in healthcare organizations. However, when the automated process uncovers a problem, human intervention is required, which only prolongs the time until the healthcare organization is paid.
Several case studies have shown a decrease in accounts receivable and an increase in patient and employee satisfaction after implementing a PLP. Perhaps it’s time to look at alternative solutions for bridging the worlds of hospital revenue collection and affordability for patients. The knowledge, expertise, and attention to detail a RCM professional offers adds immeasurable value in streamlining the PLP and improving the overall healthcare experience.
Programming Note: Listen to Susan Gatehouse today on Talk Ten Tuesdays, when she co-hosts the weekly Internet broadcast with Chuck Buck at 10 a.m. EST.
Many healthcare facilities have implemented processes that require clinical documentation integrity (CDI) staff to review all patients as quickly as possible to establish a working
In January 2026, the White House released a fact sheet announcing a call by Donald J. Trump for Congress to enact the “Great Healthcare Plan.”
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
