The temporary disappearance of key public data sets, including the Atlas Tool and the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, has raised significant concerns among data scientists, policymakers, and users of public data.
The removal and subsequent return of these crucial resources—without explanation—highlights a fundamental issue: the vulnerability of public data to political influence.
At its core, data is data.
It is a factual representation of reality, not a political tool. Yet, the recent events suggest that access to data and even its integrity could be influenced by political interests. This raises two critical concerns: first, the lack of transparency regarding changes to public data access, and second, the broader impact of political interference on the expanding world of public data.
Public data serves as an essential resource for researchers, policymakers, healthcare professionals, and the general public. Tools such as the Atlas Tool, which tracks infectious disease rates, and the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, which monitors adolescent health, provide invaluable insights that drive policy decisions and public health initiatives. However, when such data suddenly disappears without explanation, it erodes trust in the institutions that provide the data.
Transparency is a fundamental principle of public data. If datasets are removed, modified, or temporarily taken offline, there should be clear communication about the reasons for these changes. Users need to know whether the data was inaccurate, whether the presentation format was being updated, or whether it was taken down due to budgetary or technical reasons.
Without this transparency, the absence of data can lead to speculation about political motives, further undermining trust in public institutions.
Beyond access to data, there is a greater concern: the potential for political influence over the data itself. Public data should be objective, accurate, and reflective of real-world conditions. However, history has shown that data collection and presentation can be manipulated to serve political interests. Whether it is the suppression of certain statistics, the framing of data in misleading ways, or the outright fabrication of figures, political interference in data collection can have dangerous consequences.
For example, if infectious disease statistics are altered or omitted to downplay the severity of an outbreak, public health responses could be delayed, costing lives. If adolescent health data is manipulated to align with political agendas rather than reality, policymakers may enact ineffective or harmful policies.
The integrity of public data should be sacrosanct, free from the influence of any administration, regardless of political affiliation.
Over the past decades, the availability of public data has expanded significantly, thanks to technological advancements and a growing emphasis on open data initiatives. This expansion has fueled research, innovation, and informed policymaking. However, the recent disappearance of critical data sets raises concerns about whether political forces could reverse this progress.
If public data becomes a battleground for political control, the consequences could be severe. Researchers may find themselves unable to access reliable data, undermining studies and hindering scientific progress.
Policymakers may struggle to craft effective laws and programs without accurate information. The public may lose trust in government institutions that should be dedicated to facts, not politics.
To safeguard public data from political influence, several measures must be taken:
Data is not political—it is factual. When access to public data is restricted or when the data itself is influenced by political motives, the consequences can be profound, affecting public health, policy decisions, and the trust people place in their government. Ensuring that public data remains accessible, transparent, and untainted by politics is not just a matter of good governance—it is essential for a functioning democracy.
The recent removal and restoration of key datasets serve as a stark reminder that we must remain vigilant in protecting the integrity of public data. Without such protections, the very foundation of evidence-based decision-making is at risk.
Timothy Powell is a nationally recognized expert on regulatory matters including the False Claims Act, Zone Program Integrity Contractor audits and OIG compliance. He is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board.
Contact the Author:
tpowell@tpowellcpa.com
Comment on this article
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
This week I would like to address myths about multiple-choice physician queries that persist, despite guidance from the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and
I am so grateful to have the opportunity to use this platform and my Talk Ten Tuesdays segment, “My Talk,” to shine a spotlight on
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Copyright © 2025 ICD10monitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
