In the complex landscape of healthcare, hospital bed availability often plays a pivotal role in the effective management of patients. A crucial yet sometimes overlooked aspect of healthcare planning is the need for more beds, particularly in acute hospital settings. According to data from sources like the Kaiser Family Foundation, the number of hospital beds available per 1,000 individuals has been on a downward trend in many regions for years. As the COVID-19 pandemic has amply demonstrated, the absence of extra beds can put enormous strain on healthcare systems, affecting both patients and medical professionals adversely.
1. Emergency Preparedness: One of the most compelling arguments for having excess beds is to be prepared for unexpected emergencies. Natural disasters, epidemics, or mass casualty events can quickly overload a healthcare system that is operating at near-full capacity.
2. Seasonal Variations: Certain times of the year, such as flu season, see a significant increase in hospital admissions. Extra beds can absorb the influx of patients requiring acute care during these periods.
3. Surgical Scheduling: Hospitals often have to schedule non-emergency surgeries around bed availability. A buffer of extra beds allows for more flexible scheduling, thereby improving patient outcomes and satisfaction.
4. Transfers and Patient Flow: Acute-care hospitals often receive patients transferred from other facilities, emergency departments, or outpatient settings. Having a cushion of extra beds can facilitate smoother transitions and minimize delays.
5. Staff Flexibility: Extra beds provide staff the room to manage patient care more effectively. When there are more beds available, staff can be deployed more efficiently, and it becomes easier to maintain optimal nurse-to-patient ratios, thus improving the quality of care.
While exact numbers may vary depending on location and facility, some reports from the Kaiser Family Foundation indicate that the United States has been experiencing a decline in the number of hospital beds over the last few decades. This downsizing, often done to cut costs, leaves little room for flexibility in case of sudden increases in demand.
For instance, Kaiser data has shown that the number of hospital beds per 1,000 individuals fell from 3.0 in 1990 to about 2.4 in 2018. This reduction might seem modest, but when applied to an acute-care setting already operating at high capacity, it poses significant challenges in accommodating unexpected spikes in patient numbers.
The operational costs of maintaining excess beds are often cited as the primary argument against it. However, the alternative – a lack of readiness in the face of a crisis – can be much more expensive, in terms of both human lives and long-term economic impact.
Investment in excess beds should thus be viewed not as a cost, but as a form of insurance: insurance against future crises, seasonal spikes, and unforeseen events that can disrupt the normal functioning of healthcare systems.
While efficiency and resource management are vital in healthcare, a singular focus on these should not compromise the system’s ability to deal with acute needs. The data, including those from reputable organizations like the Kaiser Family Foundation, suggests that the need for excess beds in acute hospital settings is not just a matter of practicality, but a critical component in delivering quality healthcare.
By understanding the necessity for a buffer in bed capacity, healthcare providers and policymakers can better prepare for both routine healthcare delivery and unexpected crises, ensuring a more robust, responsive, and resilient healthcare system for all.
I receive a lot of newsletters every morning to help me stay abreast of what is happening in the healthcare industry. A troubling recent trend
In the CY 2026 OPPS/ASC Final Rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) formally finalized the removal of the Screening for Social Drivers
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
