Tap into Your Contracting Office for Rules of the Status Games

Since it was put into place back in 2013, most of us have managed to grasp the specifics of the Medicare two-midnight rule. Whether there was an anticipation of two midnights of medically necessary care in the hospital at the time of admission, or expectation of a second, medically necessary midnight the day following admission after a first midnight had passed, we got it. It’s become pretty engrained in our psyche.

As such, it should not be surprising that for many health systems, the two-midnight rule became the veritable law of the land. Despite knowing that managed Medicare plans, Medicaid, managed Medicaid plans, and private plans have no obligation to follow the rule, case managers are often instructed to use it when assessing patients for appropriate status. Undoubtedly, this is due to the significant potential risk of not following the rule with patients covered by Medicare. But there is also another reason.

If your case management department has no connection to or communication with your contracting office, the department and your staff are effectively flying blind. Health system contracts with private payers and managed plans have scores of details within them, not the least of which are the rules of the patient status game. Could your system have a contract right now that spells out that inpatient status is appropriate for patients who require care in the hospital for 24 hours from the time the patient is placed in a unit bed? You sure could. How about a contract indicating that patients are ineligible for inpatient status until they have required care in the hospital for 48 hours from the time the initial status order is written? Yep – you could have that, too.

Without knowing the rules, how can you play the game? It is absolutely imperative that you connect with your contracting folks and learn what you have to work with. They might be skittish at first, because the great majority of contract details are top-secret. You will have to make your case and lay the situation out for them so they understand the impact. Explain how the two-midnight rule works. Then, explain that by blindly applying the Medicare rule to all payers, you expose the health system to two distinct risks:

1) Denials and all of the re-work associated with appeals for patients placed into inpatient status incorrectly
2) Inappropriately low reimbursement for inaccurate billing due to patients kept in outpatient status with observation charges when they should have been discharged in inpatient status

Round out your discussion with an estimate of the financial impact of the two points above, and you’ll have your next appointment to discuss contract details within the following week.

I found it helpful to create a spreadsheet with all of our contracted payers listed in the left-hand column – private plans, managed Medicare plans, and managed Medicaid plans. Then, across the top row are categories such as “criteria” and “criteria start.” We learned that some criteria solely involve MCG guidelines. Others involve a specific time frame, such as 24 hours or two midnights. Include the “start” piece to know when consideration of the criteria begins. Does it start when care begins in the emergency department? How about when the first status order is written? What about when the patient actually transfers to the medical/surgical unit? This all needs to be clear so your case management staff can follow the grid accurately.

Obtaining this information from the contracts (or, if not there, within the generalized rules of the plans themselves) will likely take your contracting office a number of weeks, if not a couple of months. Fill in your spreadsheet as the information is made available, and eventually you will have a functional tool for your case managers. Once you have this situated, consider broadening the scope of the spreadsheet to include whether the managed plans follow their respective Medicare or Medicaid inpatient-only lists (or if the plan allows your physician advisor to participate in peer-to-peer calls in place of the attending physician). Once you start thinking about it, there is a wealth of information important to case management within the contracts.

Go out and get it!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Juliet Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C

Juliet B. Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C is Medical Director of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., Immediate Past President of the American College of Physician Advisors, and CEO of Velvet Hammer Physician Advising LLC. Dr. Ugarte Hopkins practiced as a pediatric hospitalist for a decade and then developed the physician advisor role for case management, utilization, and clinical documentation at a three-hospital health system where she worked for nearly another decade. She is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board, author, and national speaker.

Related Stories

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24