As the 500th episode of the Talk Ten Tuesday approaches, MedLearn Media editor Jason Henninger chatted with the broadcast’s host and creator, Chuck Buck, to look back on where the informative webcast has been and where it’s headed.
Jason Henninger: How did Talk Ten Tuesday come to be?
Chuck Buck: We had already started with RACmonitor in 2008. I got the idea on the flight to a meeting in New Jersey with a RACmonitor sponsor. While on the plane, I said to myself, we ought to do a live broadcast. I’d always been in journalism, and in broadcast either as a producer or as a talent.
I wrote the concept on the back of an air sickness bag, and I pitched Monitor Monday. We got it organized and it started in 2010. But at the same time that I was doing RACmonitor and Monitor Mondays I realized that one of the biggest issues coming up would be the United States migrating from ICD-9 to ICD-10. It had gone through a number of fits and starts during the last thirty years. There was a lot of opposition at the time. I thought, well, it’s going to be controversial, and it would be interesting to see if the United States does adopt the tenth version of the International Classification of Diseases. So, we started ICD10 Monitor in 2011 and began the broadcast , “Talk Ten Tuesdays,” reporting on ICD-10, so that’s the genesis of Talk Ten Tuesday.
Henninger: You don’t come from a coding background. What challenges did that present you?
Chuck: The biggest challenge — and I don’t think I’m alone in this — is trying to understand the anatomy involved. So much of this is body parts, this piece connected to this piece. In fact, coders will often say they need to have a refresher course on anatomy and physiology. It’s a challenge to understand what these very discrete codes they are really talking about. I put it in the category of lifelong learning. I can talk about body parts at a cocktail party now for about five minutes and sound pretty authoritative.
Henninger: When do you think we will move to ICD-11?
Chuck: That’s a subject we talk about frequently on ICD10 Monitor and Talk Ten Tuesday. The best guess I hear is four or five years from now. ICD-11 has already been adopted in a number of countries. What happens here is that ICD-11 has to go through a clinical modification. That’s going to take a couple of years. Though there are some websites up now where you can test it out, but it’s a few years away from being fully implemented.
Henninger: Will ICD-11 be very different from 10?
Buck: From what I understand, it’s more comprehensive and there are no printed code books involved. It will be all online. We have an excellent authority on this very subject, Mary Stanfill, who is now our ICD11 correspondent. She’s an excellent writer and a subject matter expert, and she’s written a few articles for us.
Henninger: Looking back over years, what stands out to you?
Buck: The projected adoption of ICD-10 was fiscal year 2015. There had been dates before that, 2013, 2014, and so forth, that got delayed and delayed. That gave us a great ride. We’d always being asked, “Are they going to adopt it now?” And no, something would always come up and delay it. The AMA at the time was opposed to it, and doctors were opposed to it. They said it was too complicated and laborious for doctors to use. It was kind of a roller coaster experience. They’d say everything is all set, then something would happen, and it would get delayed for another year. It was exciting to follow and ask, is it ever going to happen? And then, it did happen. It all made for great radio and great stories, because of the suspense and controversy. It was a fantastic experience as a journalist and as a producer.
Henninger: How has the pandemic affected the show’s content?
Buck: We’ve been reporting on the general mistrust of medicine. COVID-19 is different from swine flu and so forth because it became highly politicized. Trump was dismissive of it. In Carl Bernstein’s book, Trump said he wanted to be a cheerleader. He just wanted to bring the country good news, and he figured COVID-19 was bad news, so he tried to bat it down. So, everything associated with it, vaccines, social distancing, mask wearing, hand washing, all that became controversial and politicized.
Dr. Remer is a big advocate of vaccination, in fact she volunteers to administer vaccines. So, every time she’s brought it up, we get these critical comments asking why we’re talking vaccines, saying that they’re experimental, they aren’t proven, they use fetal tissue…all these rumors feed distrust of the vaccine.
Additionally, when the new administration came in, they focused on health equity, and of course they found health inequity for minorities. There’s a common distrust of healthcare in minorities, and whose outcomes are typically worse. There are higher rates of diabetes among African Americans, higher maternal mortality, and cardiovascular issues. This spills over into what’s referred to as the social determinants of health where income, living conditions, education and so forth are non-clinical factors now being considered part of the medical record.
Marry that distrust among minorities, now, to the distrust of vaccines and mask wearing. And a lot of Americans are also deferring medical attention for fear of the coronavirus. They’d rather delay getting that cardiogram or whatever diagnostic tests in person.
Henninger: How do you see the broadcast in the future?
Buck: I would really like to see us do a daily broadcast. Healthcare is massive, it’s changing all the time, and we have enough content and enough interest. There are so many issues that it would be helpful for people to get updated on regularly.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Now’s the time for to us to schedule those mammograms and colonoscopies we may have been putting off, but it is also a good time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
