Taking the Pain out of Pain Coding – Part II

Taking the Pain out of Pain Coding – Part II

Today we will finish up our look at pain coding, specifically acute pain, chronic pain, and neoplasm-related pain issues. 

G89.1 is our subcategory for acute pain. G89.11 identifies acute pain due to trauma. G89.12 would be assigned for acute post-thoracotomy pain. Post-thoracotomy pain not otherwise specified (NOS) is included here at G89.12. G89.18 identifies Other acute postprocedural pain. Included here are our postoperative pain and postprocedural pain NOS options.

The Official Guidelines note the acute form of the pain codes are the default for post-thoracotomy and other postoperative pain not specified as acute or chronic. We would let the provider’s documentation guide our coding of postoperative pain. A good coding reminder to note here would be that routine or expected post-op pain immediately following surgery would not be coded. 

G89.2 is our chronic pain subcategory, and we will see a similar code set listing. G89.21 assigns chronic pain due to trauma. G89.22 would identify chronic post-thoracotomy pain. No inclusion terms here; we know that our NOS options are included with the acute code. G89.28 identifies other chronic postprocedural pain.

Finally, we also have G89.29, identifying Other chronic pain. 

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) and the Cleveland Clinic agree that the timeframe for chronic pain is pain that lasts longer than three months. However, our Official Guidelines note that “there is no time frame defining when pain becomes chronic pain.” Just as with other diseases and conditions, we would use the provider’s documentation to guide our code assignment.

Keeping this in mind, it is crucial to thoroughly review all documentation to ensure you are assigning the most accurate code possible. If it is noted that a patient has chronic pain following an accident or an injury, G89.21 would be assigned.

This is often a flagged item on coding audits for missed specificity. 

We also see there is an Excludes 2 note at G89 that includes those site-specific codes. We know from the Guidelines that with that Excludes 2 note, we can code both the acute or chronic pain code with the site-specific pain code when present and documented. 

For neoplasm-related pain we would assign G89.3. Code assignment includes pain due to both primary and secondary sites of malignancy, as well as tumors.

As I noted last week, acute and chronic are non-essential modifiers here; G89.3 assigns for both. For sequencing, we would look at the reason for the patient encounter. If the encounter is for pain management, G89.3 would be assigned as the principal diagnosis. A code for the neoplasm would be assigned as a secondary diagnosis.

If the encounter is for the treatment of the neoplasm, the neoplasm would be assigned as the primary, with G89.3 assigned as secondary. Guidelines here note that it isn’t necessary to assign an additional site-specific pain code with G89.3. 

A frequent review of coding guidelines keeps us coding as painlessly as possible.  

Programming note:

Listen live today on Talk Ten Tuesday when Christine Geiger concludes her series on coding pain.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC

Chris began her health information management career in 1986, working in hospitals and as a consultant. With expertise in ICD-10 coding, audits, and education, she has contributed to compliance reviews and coding programs. She holds a Master's from Washington University, a B.S. from Saint Louis University, and has taught coding at Saint Louis University. Chris is certified in HCC risk-adjusted coding and is active in health management associations.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24