Comprehensive yet pertinent documentation is critical within the medical record. Beyond data and insight being shared among medical providers caring for a patient, good documentation also allows for accurate representation of patient severity in quality data and appropriate coding, billing, and reimbursement.
Clinical documentation improvement (CDI) queries are a critical tool in optimizing the medical record by ensuring that every aspect of the patient’s clinical condition is captured. But identifying and creating appropriate queries is only half of the process. Without provider involvement, these efforts can simply die on the vine.
Shortly after I became physician advisor for ProHealth Care in southeastern Wisconsin, I learned that one of the challenges the CDI team there faced was provider engagement with queries. Queries were kept open for up to 10 business days following patient discharge, which, when added to the time frame allowed for coding queries, often led to delay in billing of well over three weeks. This delay not only increased the risk of claim audits, but also overt denials. Additionally, it was apparent that many of the providers within the health system were concerned about altering the medical record post-discharge, and there was not a clear understanding of what CDI queries were for – nor how impactful their completion could be.
After reviewing the data, we determined that anywhere from 20-25 CDI queries went completely unanswered every quarter. Knowing that the majority of the queries were directed toward our system’s hospitalist team, which primarily works a seven-on/seven-off schedule, we settled on an eight-business day model, so even if a query was received on the final day a provider was on service, they would have time to answer it when they returned. These eight days started from the time the query was initially sent, not from the time the patient was discharged. This required education for all providers, informing them that the CDI query clock starts immediately upon receipt of a query and does not stop ticking when away from the office, on vacation, or otherwise off-service.
Next, we devised a step-wise time frame of reminders to the providers that a CDI query remained open and required attention. Two days after the initial query is routed to the provider within our electronic medical record by the clinical documentation specialist, another message is routed to the provider – in addition to a call to the office or a text page. If the query remains unanswered on days four, six, and the morning of day eight, the clinical documentation specialist informs me via email. I then send a communication to the provider about the unanswered query via fax to the office, electronic medical record message, or via secure email. Within my communication is identifying patient information, the date the query was originally sent, the date of discharge, and the diagnosis that is being queried, in addition to the time and day the query will permanently close.
There is also generalized information regarding the purpose and importance of CDI queries, and directions on how documentation can be amended in the electronic medical record following patient discharge.
Over the first three months of this new process, our unanswered CDI query rate dropped by 55 percent. Two quarters later, it dropped by 73 percent, as compared to our baseline. While a significant amount of additional effort is being put into this process, our work has clearly made a difference. Along with the electronic and paper reminders putting the work front and center in the minds of our providers, the process has also prompted thoughtful questions about what is needed and why. I have happily fielded questions from providers after they received a message from me, further strengthening the educational aspect of this process.
I encourage you to reassess your CDI query processes; consider trying these methods, and encourage engagement between your physician advisor and CDI team. You may find that a little more interaction will greatly improve your results!
Program Note: Register to hear Dr. Ugarte Hopkins on Talk Ten Tuesdays at 10:00 a.m. ET today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
