One of the most basic of human rights is healthcare. When we talk about documenting appropriately in healthcare, we must keep in mind that documentation is the second step in the process. The first step is the collection of information through subjective discussions with our patients.
We, as providers, must be non-judgmental in communicating with our patients in order to capture the most comprehensive information to provide appropriate, effective, and efficient care. We must allow our patients to be comfortable in communicating their healthcare problems, concerns, and needs.
I have practiced obstetrics and gynecology for a number of years, and therefore have learned to be comfortable in almost any environment – especially regarding discussing sexuality in patients. It is very important for patients to be comfortable and honest with me, but it is also significantly important for me to feel comfortable with my patients, no matter their sexual orientation. Specificity can only be captured through openness to, and with, our patients. For some providers, openness does not have to equal acceptance, but it must equal respectfulness, candor, and honesty.
When documenting (and coding) for transgender individuals, there are some ICD-10 codes, for example: Z87.890, personal history of sex reassignment; F64.0, transsexualism; and F64.1, transvestism. It is becoming more important to document birth sex, or genetic gender, as well as gender identity. Utilization of the sexual assignment codes will help with conflicting data, such as the reality of anatomical gender identity – females cannot have prostate cancer, but males can have breast cancer. Also, birth-sex males are 25 times more likely to develop inguinal hernias than birth-sex females, and females are incapable of suffering testicular torsion. Keep in mind that patients are all just looking for care as human beings, and treatment reflecting as such. Therefore, the most appropriate way to document gender is to capture whether a patient is transgender, and then the anatomical birth sex, as well as the current specific gender identity. This best meets both the needs of the patient and the documentation system, within which we must work. The medical record must be evidence-based, factually based, but inclusive of the sensitivities and preferences of our patient.
When I was in clinical practice, I had a significant lesbian and bisexual population. Even before patients were “coming out,” distinct, unique needs were self-evident. This guided my thinking, as well as my practice, toward being non-judgmental. One of the points that was very evident was that no matter their sexual orientation, patients just want to be treated and respected as human beings, no more and definitely no less. I must admit that I had challenges initially in providing care for transgender patients. But I soon found out that even though there was nothing I could do for them gynecologically, they were coming to an environment that they hoped would be accepting and safe.
I am sorry to this day that I never at least talked to the first transgender patient who came to my office (I had her sent away by my staff). I turned her away because I felt that there was nothing I could do for her. After that time, I have talked to transgender patients upon presentation to my office, and found that there was just basic medical care that was needed – not gynecological. Such patients usually just wanted to come to an environment where they did not feel judged. This is what we all should be allowed to have in life – no more and definitely no less.
This past weekend we “fell back” and gained that extra hour. This makes it a good time to look at how we assign codes for
October is National Dental Hygiene Month, a great time to take a look at dental coding. For coders who assign ICD-10 codes, our first thought
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
