Staying Current with Medical Necessity

Staying Current with Medical Necessity

A new quarter began on Oct. 1, an event that usually brings updates to National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). The coding updates included for Oct. 1 are specified in Change Request (CR) 13166, which is a maintenance update. This document is mentioned in the MLN Connects published Sept. 28.

Coding changes impacted NCD 20.20 (External Counterpulsation Therapy for Severe Angina); NCD 90.2 (Next Generation Sequencing), both effective Aug. 7; and NCD 210.1 (Prostate Screening Tests), effective Oct. 1.

It is important to know where to find these NCDs, and to be aware when they change, as these do affect medical necessity edits. Do you receive emails from the billing office when a case was not coded correctly, or a specific case failed medical necessity edits? Coders should review the medical record for additional diagnoses contained in the NCDs. If the case is outpatient, include the additional codes in the “Reason for Visit” fields. There are three available fields for Reason for Visit. You may want to verify that your abstracting system has been set up to accept three such diagnoses. If the case is inpatient, the diagnosis may be included as the admitting diagnosis or a secondary diagnosis.

Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) are established by Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). The MACs have specific geographic areas, as seen in the map below:

LCD topics can vary among MACs. Their varying policies may be another reason why a case does not pass medical necessity. The LCDs are additional documents that may be reviewed for signs/symptoms/diagnoses that can be coded to remain compliant.

Coders can assist in recovering monies by reviewing cases that fail medical necessity edits. It is a best practice to review medical necessity prior to performing elective tests. When medical necessity is not met, physicians can be queried for additional signs and symptoms that led them to perform the test in question. If medical necessity is still not met, then the patient can be informed about the financial obligation and sign an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN). This process should be completed prior to performing the test.

Many facilities write off cases that do not meet medical necessity, which reduces the facility’s financial status. The business office can produce a list of cases that did not pass medical necessity. This list can be worked daily by the coding staff, even after the cases have been completed. The coder will review the clinical documentation to determine if it supports additional diagnoses to be reported and passes medical necessity.

It is important in today’s environment to collect all the monies that are legitimately due to a facility. One place to start is reviewing cases that do not pass medical necessity.

Resources:

MLN Connects, September 28

NCD 90.2 “Next Generation Sequencing”: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncd.aspx?NCDId=372

NCD 210.1 “Prostate Cancer Screening”: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncd.aspx?NCDId=268

NCD 20.20 “External Counterpulsation Therapy for Severe Angina”: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncd.aspx?ncdid=97&ncdver=2

Medicare Administrative Contractors:  https://www.cms.gov/medicare/coding-billing/medicare-administrative-contractors-macs/who-are-macs#MapsandLists

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Laurie M. Johnson, MS, RHIA, FAHIMA, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Laurie Johnson is currently a senior healthcare consultant for Revenue Cycle Solutions, based in Pittsburgh, Pa. Laurie is an AHIMA-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer. She has more than 35 years of experience in health information management and specializes in coding and related functions. She has been a featured speaker in over 40 conferences. Laurie is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is a permanent panelist on Talk Ten Tuesdays

Related Stories

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 Impact on Coding

H.R. 1 doesn’t directly rewrite ICD-10 or CPT, but it does change the environment in which you’re coding. The impact is mostly indirect – through

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24